mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Protective Perturbations Must Survive the Resize: Scale-Robust Image Immunization against Malicious Editing

arXiv 2610.07464 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects

Abstract (arXiv)

While instruction-guided editors built on diffusion transformers can turn a personal photo into a convincing forgery with a single sentence, protective perturbations aim to make such edits fail before the photo is ever shared. The threat is most acute for the photos people actually share, which have 10 megapixels or more and which current editors first downscale by a factor that the owner does not know. Existing protections are computed at one resolution or averaged over random scales, and they lose most of their effect once the photo is downscaled. They implicitly assume that the editor sees the scale for which they were optimized, or that protecting the average scale protects every scale. We propose SRIM, a protection that remains effective at every scale an editor may use, without knowing its preprocessing and at the same computational cost as standard expectation over transformation. SRIM covers the range of scales implied by the photo size with anchor scales and spends each optimization step on the scale where the protection is currently weakest. A spectral analysis shows that this worst-case protection degrades only logarithmically with the width of the range, a value that averaging over scales cannot reach. Extensive experiments on full-resolution photos and popular instruction-guided editors validate that SRIM gives the strongest protection, outperforming existing methods even with a quarter of their ℓ_∞ budget, remaining the strongest under input purification.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

11 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Purify Once, Edit Freely: Breaking Image Protections under Model Mismatch13 Mar
  2. 2025DeContext as Defense: Safe Image Editing in Diffusion Transformers18 Dec
  3. 2025Towards Transferable Defense Against Malicious Image Edits16 Dec
  4. 2025My Face Is Mine, Not Yours: Facial Protection Against Diffusion Model Face Swapping21 May
  5. 2023Mist: Towards Improved Adversarial Examples for Diffusion Models22 May
  6. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purification16 May

Other references · 5

  1. 2025Qwen-Image Technical Reportcited by 1,044
  2. 2025FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Spacecited by 1,006
  3. 2026Adversarial Attacks for Good: A Survey of Proactive Protection across the Visual Content Lifecyclecited by 2
  4. 2025Towards Robust Protective Perturbation against DeepFake Face Swappingcited by 1
  5. 2026Do Protective Perturbations Really Protect Portrait Privacy under Real-world Image Transformations?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Semantic Mismatch and Perceptual Degradation: A New Perspective on Image Editing Immunity
  2. 2025Is Perturbation-Based Image Protection Disruptive to Image Editing?
  3. 2026NullEdit: Stealthy Image Protection via VLM Condition Redirection
  4. 2023Raising the Cost of Malicious AI-Powered Image Editing
  5. 2025Structure Disruption: Subverting Malicious Diffusion-Based Inpainting via Self-Attention Query Perturbation
  6. 2023JPEG Compressed Images Can Bypass Protections Against AI Editing
  7. 2024Edit Away and My Face Will not Stay: Personal Biometric Defense against Malicious Generative Editing
  8. 2026When Recovery Matters: The Blind Spot of Surrogate Privacy in MLLM Editing