Contextualized Prompting For Stance Detection On Social Media
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stance detection on social media is challenging due to short, noisy, and context-dependent language. While large language models (LLMs) show zero-shot generalization, they are typically prompted without contextual information, which limits their ability to interpret ambiguous posts. In this work, we systematically investigate the impact of incorporating real-world (e.g., user biographies), derived (e.g., political party), and LLM-generated (e.g., target descriptions) contextual features into zero-shot prompting for stance detection on Twitter. Our evaluation spans four benchmark datasets, including a new high-quality German Twitter stance dataset. Across multiple LLMs, we find that integrating contextual information improves performance, but only under specific conditions. LLM-generated target descriptions consistently enhance accuracy, while other user metadata has mixed or even detrimental effects. Notably, we show that the inclusion of other tweets by the same user, often beneficial in supervised learning, can impair performance due to input noise. Our qualitative analysis reveals that LLMs struggle to distinguish task-specific useful information from irrelevant context. Our findings highlight both the promise and challenges of prompting with context information in noisy real-world settings. We publish code and data at this hrefhttps://github.com/tilmanbeck/stance-context-twitterpage.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
25 of 69 references.
References · 25
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 232
- 2023Increasing Diversity While Maintaining Accuracy: Text Data Generation with Large Language Models and Human Interventionscited by 125
- 2016Stance Detection with Bidirectional Conditional Encodingcited by 93
- 2018Cross-topic Argument Mining from Heterogeneous Sources Using Attention-based Neural Networkscited by 58
- 2019Classification and Clustering of Arguments with Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 57
- 2020Will-They-Won't-They: A Very Large Dataset for Stance Detection on Twittercited by 54
- 2023Stance Detection with Collaborative Role-Infused LLM-Based Agentscited by 53
13 more
- 2019Unsupervised User Stance Detection on Twittercited by 45
- 2020Stance Detection Benchmark: How Robust Is Your Stance Detection?cited by 33
- 2021Cross-Domain Label-Adaptive Stance Detectioncited by 30
- 2022Infusing Knowledge from Wikipedia to Enhance Stance Detectioncited by 20
- 2019Your Stance is Exposed! Analysing Possible Factors for Stance Detection on Social Mediacited by 18
- 2024Empowering Large Language Models for Textual Data Augmentationcited by 17
- 2021Investigating label suggestions for opinion mining in German Covid-19 social mediacited by 15
- 2023Chain-of-Thought Embeddings for Stance Detection on Social Mediacited by 13
- 2024Stance Reasoner: Zero-Shot Stance Detection on Social Media with Explicit Reasoningcited by 12
- 2021STEM: Unsupervised STructural EMbedding for Stance Detectioncited by 9
- 2022Contextual information integration for stance detection via cross-attentioncited by 6
- 2025Is External Information Useful for Stance Detection with LLMs?cited by 4
- 2026Exploiting contextual information to improve stance detection in informal political discourse with LLMscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.