mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Investigating label suggestions for opinion mining in German Covid-19 social media

arXiv 2105.12980 ↗First posted 27 May 2021cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work investigates the use of interactively updated label suggestions to improve upon the efficiency of gathering annotations on the task of opinion mining in German Covid-19 social media data. We develop guidelines to conduct a controlled annotation study with social science students and find that suggestions from a model trained on a small, expert-annotated dataset already lead to a substantial improvement - in terms of inter-annotator agreement(+.14 Fleiss' kappa) and annotation quality - compared to students that do not receive any label suggestions. We further find that label suggestions from interactively trained models do not lead to an improvement over suggestions from a static model. Nonetheless, our analysis of suggestion bias shows that annotators remain capable of reflecting upon the suggested label in general. Finally, we confirm the quality of the annotated data in transfer learning experiments between different annotator groups. To facilitate further research in opinion mining on social media data, we release our collected data consisting of 200 expert and 2,785 student annotations.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2021.

Builds on

10 of 38 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  4. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 8: RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity and support for rumourscited by 77
  5. 2020From Arguments to Key Points: Towards Automatic Argument Summarizationcited by 60
  6. 2020Will-They-Won't-They: A Very Large Dataset for Stance Detection on Twittercited by 53
  7. 2018A Retrospective Analysis of the Fake News Challenge Stance Detection Taskcited by 49
  8. 2016Twitter as a Lifeline: Human-annotated Twitter Corpora for NLP of Crisis-related Messagescited by 43
  9. 2018Integrating Stance Detection and Fact Checking in a Unified Corpuscited by 41
  10. 2019Analysis of Automatic Annotation Suggestions for Hard Discourse-Level Tasks in Expert Domainscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort: