Forgive or forget: Understanding the context of hate in audio retrieval systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Handling toxic retrieval in text-to-audio systems is challenging due to contextual dependencies. Existing strategies (e.g., rephrasing, summarization) risk altering intent or omitting details. We propose a post hoc causal debiasing framework with a sentiment-controlled mediator to preserve semantic relevance while suppressing harmful speech. Our approach is model-agnostic and integrates seamlessly with existing retrieval pipelines. We introduce two variants: Forgive, which re-ranks and filters toxic audio via logit adjustment, and Forget, which generates counterfactual toxic prompts to mitigate harmful retrievals. Experiments show consistent toxicity reduction with minimal loss in retrieval accuracy, improving both safety and reliability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 16 references.
References · 8
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2018Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Datacited by 533
- 2019Clotho: An Audio Captioning Datasetcited by 358
- 2023WavCaps: A ChatGPT-Assisted Weakly-Labelled Audio Captioning Dataset for Audio-Language Multimodal Researchcited by 267
- 2023Audio-Text Models Do Not Yet Leverage Natural Languagecited by 26
- 2024MuTox: Universal MUltilingual Audio-based TOXicity Dataset and Zero-shot Detectorcited by 15
- 2023NOMAD: Unsupervised Learning of Perceptual Embeddings for Speech Enhancement and Non-matching Reference Audio Quality Assessmentcited by 3
- 2024Dissecting Temporal Understanding in Text-to-Audio Retrievalcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.