Dominant-Layer ZO: A Single Layer Dominates Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Zeroth-order (ZO) optimization enables memory-efficient fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) using only forward passes, but it remains unclear how useful adaptation is distributed across layers. In this work, we reveal a surprising phenomenon: ZO fine-tuning is sharply dominated by a single decoding layer. Across multiple LLM families and downstream tasks, fine-tuning this dominant layer alone consistently matches or even exceeds full-model ZO fine-tuning. We further show that the dominant layer is task-agnostic but model-specific, and can be identified before training through a simple inference-only analysis of activation outliers. Specifically, the dominant layer consistently aligns with the first activation-outlier layer in the pre-trained model. To explain this phenomenon, we analyze how perturbation effects propagate under ZO optimization. We find that the dominant layer combines two key properties: high perturbation sensitivity and early placement in the residual stream, allowing perturbation-induced effects to propagate and accumulate through remaining subsequent decoding layers. As a result, this layer produces disproportionately strong and stable optimization signals under forward-only updates. Extensive experiments on LLaMA2-7B and Qwen3-8B across nine benchmarks show that dominant-layer ZO fine-tuning improves average performance over full-model MeZO and LoRA-based ZO fine-tuning while achieving up to 4.52× training speedup.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.
Builds on
23 of 40 references.
References · 23
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,386
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
- 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passescited by 345
- 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 294
- 2019ZO-AdaMM: Zeroth-Order Adaptive Momentum Method for Black-Box Optimizationcited by 76
- 2024Sparse MeZO: Less Parameters for Better Performance in Zeroth-Order LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 54
11 more
- 2024Second-Order Fine-Tuning without Pain for LLMs:A Hessian Informed Zeroth-Order Optimizercited by 53
- 2024Enhancing Zeroth-order Fine-tuning for Language Models with Low-rank Structurescited by 50
- 2025Systematic Outliers in Large Language Modelscited by 33
- 2024Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs in Random Subspacescited by 26
- 2025Harmony in Divergence: Towards Fast, Accurate, and Memory-efficient Zeroth-order LLM Fine-tuningcited by 18
- 2025FZOO: Fast Zeroth-Order Optimizer for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models towards Adam-Scale Speedcited by 14
- 2024Simultaneous Computation and Memory Efficient Zeroth-Order Optimizer for Fine-Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2024Outlier-weighed Layerwise Sampling for LLM Fine-tuningcited by 8
- 2024Layer-wise Importance Matters: Less Memory for Better Performance in Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2026AGZO: Activation-Guided Zeroth-Order Optimization for LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 4
- 2025Learning a Zeroth-Order Optimizer for Fine-Tuning LLMscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.