A Systematic Analysis of Linguistic Features in AI-Generated Text Detection Across Domains and Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interpretable linguistic features offer a promising approach for explaining why a given text appears machine-generated, particularly for non-expert users. However, existing findings on which features reliably indicate LLM-generated text remain fragmented across feature sets, models, and text domains. To address this gap, we conduct a large-scale empirical study assessing the robustness of linguistic signals for characterizing AI-generated text. Our analysis covers 284 interpretable linguistic features across outputs from 27 LLMs and ten text domains under cross-model and cross-domain generalization settings. We show that classifiers based solely on linguistic features can reliably distinguish AI-generated from human-written text. However, many previously proposed indicators prove strongly context-dependent, with the exception of measures of lexical richness, which remain robust signals across model families and text domains. These results demonstrate which linguistic signals generalize across contexts and provide a foundation for more reliable, interpretable analyses of AI-generated language.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
14 of 28 references.
References · 14
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
- 2023OUTFOX: LLM-Generated Essay Detection Through In-Context Learning with Adversarially Generated Examplescited by 80
- 2023Contrasting Linguistic Patterns in Human and LLM-Generated News Textcited by 62
- 2024Do LLMs write like humans? Variation in grammatical and rhetorical stylescited by 62
- 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 53
- 2017Word Affect Intensitiescited by 51
- 2024StyloAI: Distinguishing AI-Generated Content with Stylometric Analysiscited by 17
- 2024Spotting AI's Touch: Identifying LLM-Paraphrased Spans in Textcited by 16
- 2024Exploring the Limitations of Detecting Machine-Generated Textcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.