Thinking Through Signs: PEEL as a Semiotic Scaffolding for Epistemically Accountable AI-Enabled Research
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models are reshaping research practice while quietly eroding researchers epistemic accountability. This commentary introduces PEEL - Protocols for Epistemically Engaged Literacy in AI, a working scaffolding that combines deterministic distant reading via Voyant Tools with LLM interpretation via Claude, grounded in Peircean semiotics and abductive reasoning. Applied to AI-generated condensations of three source texts, PEEL reveals systematic distortions in quantity, term frequency, and epistemic voice that are invisible without non-AI measurement -- and yields three design implications: deterministic instruments must accompany AI tools; fluency is not fidelity; epistemic authority must be designed in, not assumed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 1 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
1 of 22 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligence
- 2025The Epistemic Suite: A Post-Foundational Diagnostic Methodology for Assessing AI Knowledge Claims
- 2026How Researchers Navigate Accountability, Transparency, and Trust When Using AI Tools in Early-Stage Research: A Think-Aloud Study
- 2026Architecting Trust in Artificial Epistemic Agents
- 2026Strategic Polysemy in AI Discourse: A Philosophical Analysis of Language, Hype, and Power
- 2025The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoning
- 2025Agentic AI as Undercover Teammates: Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Hybrid Human-AI Collaborative Learning
- 2025Beyond "Hallucinations": A Framework for Stable Human-AI Reasoning