Proof-Carrying Agent Actions: Model-Agnostic Runtime Governance for Heterogeneous Agent Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Agent systems execute through runtimes with very different control points: local coding tools, framework SDKs, managed agent platforms, API gateways, and observer-only integrations. A high-risk action such as publishing data externally may therefore appear as a shell command in one runtime, a tool call in another, and a hosted session transition in a third. This makes it difficult to answer a basic governance question consistently: what action was authorized, under whose authority, with what approval semantics, and with what evidence after execution? This paper presents Proof-Carrying Agent Actions (PCAA), a runtime-neutral governance model centered on an action certificate rather than on a vendor-native session record. PCAA organizes control around five checkpoints: pre-action admissibility, action open, assumption capture, approval, and outcome closure. It binds these checkpoints to a portable action envelope, runtime and approval receipts, and replay-ready proof. The model is extended in two practical ways: the certificate is externality-aware, carrying boundary facts such as destination visibility and account provenance, and approval is described by explicit enforceability classes rather than by a single reviewed or unreviewed bit. We study the model through a reference implementation in a heterogeneous agent control plane and a disclosure-bounded evaluation protocol. On a protected benchmark expanded from 24 executable seeds to 96 traces across four runtime families, PCAA preserves route quality while exposing distinct failure modes under ablation. The paper contributes a systems formulation of runtime governance around certificate-bearing actions and an implementation-grounded account of how that formulation can remain portable under runtime churn without collapsing into vendor-specific control surfaces.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
3 of 20 references.
References · 3
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2026Auditable Agentscited by 14
- 2025Selective Conformal Risk Controlcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026CAVA: Canonical Action Verification and Attestation for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systemscited by 3
- 2026Final Authority in AI Governance: Frontier-Provider Sovereignty and Action-Centered Deployer Governancecited by 0
- 2026PRIMUS: Identity, Governance, and Verification for Multi-Agent Federationscited by 0
- 2026ZeroGate: Trust-Preserving Fast Paths for Governed AI Agent Runtimescited by 0
- 2026Beyond Approved Actions: Runtime Validation of Persistent Outcomes in Agent Workflowscited by 0
- 2026Same Winners, Different Success Rates: Evaluating How LLM Agents Recover from Failurescited by 0
- 2026Same Winners, Different Success Rates: Evaluating How LLM Agents Recover from Failures28 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Approved Actions: Runtime Validation of Persistent Outcomes in Agent Workflows25 Sep 2026
- 2026ZeroGate: Trust-Preserving Fast Paths for Governed AI Agent Runtimes21 Sep 2026
- 2026PRIMUS: Identity, Governance, and Verification for Multi-Agent Federations7 Sep 2026
- 2026CAVA: Canonical Action Verification and Attestation for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems15 Jul 2026
- 2026Final Authority in AI Governance: Frontier-Provider Sovereignty and Action-Centered Deployer Governance12 Jun 2026