Neuron Populations Exhibit Divergent Selectivity with Scale
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate whether neuron populations within neural networks evolve predictably with scale, extending scaling laws beyond macroscopic observables such as loss. To probe this question, we study Rosetta Neurons, a previously characterized class of neurons whose activation patterns are similar across independently trained models (Dravid et al., 2023). In separate analyses of language models up to 30B parameters and vision models up to 5B parameters, we observe that the population of Rosetta Neurons follows a sublinear power law in model size, growing in absolute number but occupying a shrinking fraction of the total neuron count. We further observe a Neuron Polarization Effect: Rosetta Neurons become more selective and increasingly monosemantic with scale, separating from a growing non-Rosetta population that remains less selective. An analytical model balancing feature utility against limited neuron capacity explains the sublinear power-law scaling and this polarization effect. Finally, we find that Rosetta Neurons become more domain-specialized with scale and illustrate their selectivity through a targeted data-filtering case study for continued pretraining. Our results point to a scaling law for interpretable, shared neuron-level structure, linking model size to systematic changes in neuron universality, selectivity, and specialization.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
45 of 65 references.
References · 45
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
33 more
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
- 2019CodeSearchNet Challenge: Evaluating the State of Semantic Code Searchcited by 654
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 363
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
- 2014Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalencecited by 243
- 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 220
- 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 209
- 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
- 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
- 2017Learning to Generate Reviews and Discovering Sentimentcited by 148
- 2022CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networkscited by 147
- 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 138
- 2024Universal Neurons in GPT2 Language Modelscited by 102
- 2025SANA-Sprint: One-Step Diffusion with Continuous-Time Consistency Distillationcited by 87
- 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 77
- 2024A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agentcited by 63
- 2018Towards Understanding Learning Representations: To What Extent Do Different Neural Networks Learn the Same Representationcited by 62
- 2026One-step Latent-free Image Generation with Pixel Mean Flowscited by 53
- 2023Rosetta Neurons: Mining the Common Units in a Model Zoocited by 46
- 2025Superposition Yields Robust Neural Scalingcited by 31
- 2026Deriving Neural Scaling Laws from the statistics of natural languagecited by 23
- 2025In Pursuit of Pixel Supervision for Visual Pre-trainingcited by 13
- 2026Why Larger Models Learn More: Effects of Capacity, Interference, and Rare-Task Retentioncited by 10
- 2026Disentangling MLP Neuron Weights in Vocabulary Spacecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Scaling Inherently Interpretable Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Scaling Inherently Interpretable Language Models6 Aug 2026