mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Forecasting Conceptual Diffusion in Science: The Case of Quantum Computing

arXiv 2606.03919 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2026cs.SI cs.CY cs.DLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding and anticipating scientific change requires models that distinguish between endogenous consolidation and exogenous diffusion of scientific concepts. Using the quantum computing subtree of concepts in OpenAlex, we construct a temporally resolved concept co-occurrence network and track each concept pair through its upstream citation lineage and downstream diffusion. We train LightGBM models on distributional and diversity-aware features to predict four outcomes: endogenous reinforcement, exogenous diffusion, their ratio, and diffusion entropy. After controlling for overall publication growth of the scientific body, endogenous reinforcement proves largely unpredictable in the primary quantum-computing benchmark. In contrast, exogenous diffusion and entropy are strongly predictable (R2 up to 0.78`a) and are driven by upstream heterogeneity, citation breadth, and distributional dispersion, as shown by SHAP analyses; replications on robotics, advanced materials, and neuro implants confirm that exogenous diffusion remains the top-ranked target across fields (R2test ~ 0.60-0.87), while endogenous predictability rises markedly in neuro implants (R2test = 0.83), indicating that the quantum-computing asymmetry does not generalise uniformly. Case studies reveal that sharp entropy increases coincide with the opening of new conceptual frontiers, while entropy collapses signal technological convergence or paradigm displacement. These results demonstrate that conceptual diffusion is governed by stable structural regularities embedded in semantic and citation environments. By identifying early diversity-based signals of cross-domain uptake, the approach provides a scalable foundation for anticipatory scientometrics, technology foresight, and innovation-oriented policy analysis in rapidly evolving research fields.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

Builds on

11 of 39 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  3. 2022OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and conceptscited by 177
  4. 2022Predicting the Future of AI with AI: High-quality link prediction in an exponentially growing knowledge networkcited by 36
  5. 2019Predicting Research Trends with Semantic and Neural Networks with an application in Quantum Physicscited by 25
  6. 2024Forecasting high-impact research topics via machine learning on evolving knowledge graphscited by 22
  7. 2014Invention as a Combinatorial Process: Evidence from U.S. Patentscited by 10
  8. 2018International Research Collaboration: Novelty, Conventionality, and Atypicality in Knowledge Recombinationcited by 8
  9. 2016The Memory of Science: Inflation, Myopia, and the Knowledge Networkcited by 4
  10. 2015Does diversity of papers affect their citations? Evidence from American Physical Society Journalscited by 1
  11. 2018Predicting Citation Counts with a Neural Networkcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.