mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Text-to-Image Models Need Less from Text Encoders Than You Think

arXiv 2606.03715 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image models rely on text prompts as their primary interface to human intent. Prompts are encoded by a text encoder into embeddings that condition the image generation process. Beyond individual token meanings, text embeddings encode contextual information across the full prompt, such as compositionality and attribute binding. However, whether image models actually exploit this richer information remains underexplored. Here, we address the question: Which aspects of text representation are essential for image generation? We show that text-to-image diffusion transformer-based models commonly rely only on two relatively straightforward aspects of text representations: (i) the merging of adjacent tokens into a word representation, for words spanning multiple tokens, and (ii) word order, which is imprinted by the positional embedding of the text-encoder. To show this, we construct a new text embedding that encodes only individual word meanings and order but lacks any contextual information about the full prompt. We find that this bag of position-tagged words representation is sufficient to successfully guide image generation, achieving visual quality and text fidelity that are on par with full text embedding-guided generation. This demonstrates that, contrary to common belief, text-to-image models often do not use the rich information encoded in the text embedding beyond individual word meanings and word order. Instead, the decoding of complex linguistic structures is performed by the image model itself. Project webpage: https://nsping13.github.io/contextless-TTI/

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

Builds on

30 of 37 references.

References · 30

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  7. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
  8. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
  9. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  10. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  11. 2022Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Controlcited by 2,431
  12. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
18 more
  1. 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,293
  2. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,216
  3. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  4. 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignmentcited by 972
  5. 2023Attend-and-Excite: Attention-Based Semantic Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 702
  6. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  7. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
  8. 2024ELLA: Equip Diffusion Models with LLM for Enhanced Semantic Alignmentcited by 475
  9. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 243
  10. 2022What the DAAM: Interpreting Stable Diffusion Using Cross Attentioncited by 236
  11. 2024DreamBench++: A Human-Aligned Benchmark for Personalized Image Generationcited by 131
  12. 2024Prometheus-Vision: Vision-Language Model as a Judge for Fine-Grained Evaluationcited by 125
  13. 2024VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Modelscited by 53
  14. 2024Emergence of Hidden Capabilities: Exploring Learning Dynamics in Concept Spacecited by 35
  15. 2024Diffusion Lens: Interpreting Text Encoders in Text-to-Image Pipelinescited by 30
  16. 2025Scaling Down Text Encoders of Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 8
  17. 2026Circuit Mechanisms for Spatial Relation Generation in Diffusion Transformerscited by 3
  18. 2025DeLeaker: Dynamic Inference-Time Reweighting For Semantic Leakage Mitigation in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Improving Compositional Attribute Binding in Text-to-Image Generative Models via Enhanced Text Embeddings
  2. 2025TextInVision: Text and Prompt Complexity Driven Visual Text Generation Benchmark
  3. 2025Decoder-Only LLMs are Better Controllers for Diffusion Models
  4. 2024Magnet: We Never Know How Text-to-Image Diffusion Models Work, Until We Learn How Vision-Language Models Function
  5. 2023Multi-Concept T2I-Zero: Tweaking Only The Text Embeddings and Nothing Else
  6. 2024Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Prompt Encoding for Diffusion Models
  7. 2025Rare Text Semantics Were Always There in Your Diffusion Transformer
  8. 2024Prompt-Softbox-Prompt: A Free-Text Embedding Control for Image Editing