Investigating and Alleviating Harm Amplification in LLM Interactions
On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) can serve as helpful assistants, yet they can equally function as harm amplifiers that enable malicious users to achieve harmful outcomes beyond their capabilities through extended interactions. This risk manifests along two axes, i.e., democratizing domain expertise that allows novices to produce specialized harmful content, and scaling harmful operations at volumes that manual effort cannot match. Existing works, however, often overlook how LLMs compound harm across multi-turn conversations. We introduce HarmAmp, a new benchmark for multi-turn harm amplification scenarios spanning twelve risk categories. Each scenario is grounded in real-world threats and satisfies rigorous criteria, i.e., substantive amplification, operational specificity, and multi-turn necessity. We further propose TrajSafe, a proactive monitor that anticipates harmful trajectories and intervenes through actions such as probing users' genuine intents and steering the models towards safer completion. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that TrajSafe significantly reduces the harmfulness incurred in multi-turn interactions while preserving a low over-refusal rate and the target model's general capabilities. Our work offers a promising paradigm to alleviate the nuanced safety risks in LLM interactions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.
Builds on
21 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025SafeSwitch: Steering Unsafe LLM Behavior via Internal Activation Signals3 Feb
- 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs26 Jun
- 2024CoSafe: Evaluating Large Language Model Safety in Multi-Turn Dialogue Coreference25 Jun
- 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakers6 Jun
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct
Other references · 16
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agentscited by 406
- 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attackcited by 364
- 2025MultiChallenge: A Realistic Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark Challenging to Frontier LLMscited by 171
- 2024LLM Defenses Are Not Robust to Multi-Turn Human Jailbreaks Yetcited by 145
- 2025X-Teaming: Multi-Turn Jailbreaks and Defenses with Adaptive Multi-Agentscited by 112
- 2025From Hard Refusals to Safe-Completions: Toward Output-Centric Safety Trainingcited by 49
- 2025SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants?cited by 45
- 2025MTSA: Multi-turn Safety Alignment for LLMs through Multi-round Red-teamingcited by 31
4 more
- 2024HarmAug: Effective Data Augmentation for Knowledge Distillation of Safety Guard Modelscited by 17
- 2025How to Protect Yourself from 5G Radiation? Investigating LLM Responses to Implicit Misinformationcited by 17
- 2025Tree-based Dialogue Reinforced Policy Optimization for Red-Teaming Attackscited by 8
- 2023Meta-Tuning LLMs to Leverage Lexical Knowledge for Generalizable Language Style Understandingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.