mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Edge-aware Decoding for Neural Asymmetric Routing

arXiv 2606.02136 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural asymmetric routing models increasingly encode directionality through matrix representations and asymmetry-aware attention. The final routing action, however, is not a node in isolation but a directed transition chosen under the current partial route. This creates a representation--decision mismatch: pairwise cost information may be encoded upstream while the final candidate logit is still largely parameterized as context--node compatibility. We propose a decoder-design principle for neural asymmetric routing: the final score should explicitly expose transition-level quantities suggested by the problem's cost-to-go structure. We instantiate this principle with an edge-aware decoder that adds candidate-specific terms for the current directed edge, return-to-start closure, and static lightweight lookahead, while keeping the representation backbone fixed. On a controlled SVD/Sinkhorn asymmetric backbone, the decoder improves over the RADAR reference when trained on ATSP-100 and evaluated zero-shot on ATSP-100/200/500/1000, reducing the ATSP-1000 gap from 4.13% to 2.73%. On ACVRP, the same score-level modification shows the same qualitative trend under a richer routing state. ATSP ablations and directed-transition diagnostics sharpen the mechanism: the strongest evidence concerns sensitivity to the current directed edge, while closure and static lookahead act as heuristic continuation cues. The results support a mechanism study: a key decoder-side signal in neural asymmetric routing is decision-time exposure of transition-level edge information.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

13 of 16 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 646
  2. 2020POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learningcited by 341
  3. 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 318
  4. 2023Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Heavy Decoder: Toward Large Scale Generalizationcited by 140
  5. 2021Matrix Encoding Networks for Neural Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 89
  6. 2023GLOP: Learning Global Partition and Local Construction for Solving Large-scale Routing Problems in Real-timecited by 82
  7. 2023Towards Generalizable Neural Solvers for Vehicle Routing Problems via Ensemble with Transferrable Local Policycited by 61
  8. 2024RouteFinder: Towards Foundation Models for Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 54
  9. 2024UDC: A Unified Neural Divide-and-Conquer Framework for Large-Scale Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 45
  10. 2025Rethinking Light Decoder-based Solvers for Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 36
  11. 2024Distance-aware Attention Reshaping: Enhance Generalization of Neural Solver for Large-scale Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 15
  12. 2025RRNCO: Towards Real-World Routing with Neural Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 10
1 more
  1. 2026RADAR: Learning to Route with Asymmetry-aware DistAnce Representationscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.