mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Before the Model Learns the Bug:Fuzzing RLVR Verifiers

arXiv 2606.01066 ↗First posted 31 May 2026cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) replaces human preference labels with executable reward functions such as math answer checkers, JSON tool-call validators, and code unit-test harnesses. That makes the reward partly a software artifact: if the verifier is wrong, optimization can learn the bug. We study this failure mode with a lightweight verifier-fuzzing framework that generates adversarial completions, compares buggy and stricter reference verifiers, logs paired decisions, and reports false-positive, false-negative, disagreement, exploit, and uncertainty metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2026.

Builds on

5 of 6 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  2. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  3. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  4. 2026LLMs Gaming Verifiers: RLVR can Lead to Reward Hackingcited by 24
  5. 2026Countdown-Code: A Testbed for Studying The Emergence and Generalization of Reward Hacking in RLVRcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.