hZACH-ViT: Curved Latent Geometry for Compact Vision Transformers in Low-Data Medical Imaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compact Vision Transformers are attractive for medical imaging in low-data and resource-constrained settings, but most existing variants assume that Euclidean latent geometry is sufficient for organizing image representations. We introduce hZACH-ViT, a family of curved-geometry extensions of ZACH-ViT, a compact zero-token Vision Transformer that removes positional embeddings and the class token and relies on global average pooling over patch representations. To isolate the role of geometry, we preserve the verified ZACH-ViT backbone and modify only the final representation space and prototype-based classifier head, enabling a controlled comparison between Euclidean, hyperbolic, and spherical latent geometries. We evaluate Poincar'e, Klein, and spherical hZACH-ViT heads on seven MedMNIST datasets under an identical few-shot protocol with 50 samples per class and five random seeds. The completed benchmark contains 770 training runs spanning seven datasets, three non-Euclidean geometries, seven curvature magnitudes, and a Euclidean baseline. Across all seven datasets, the best non-Euclidean hZACH-ViT configuration improves over Euclidean ZACH-ViT, with an average gain of +0.021 in the dataset-specific primary metric and the largest improvement on OCTMNIST (+0.055 MacroF1). Fixed low-curvature configurations retain positive gains on the majority of datasets, and low curvature values (c = 0.1 or 0.2) account for six of the seven dataset-level winners. Rather than identifying a universally optimal manifold, our results establish geometry and curvature as dataset-dependent model-selection variables, with fixed low-curvature analyses confirming that gains persist beyond exhaustive per-dataset tuning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.
Builds on
20 of 26 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
- 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 733
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
8 more
- 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
- 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 400
- 2018Hyperbolic Neural Networkscited by 393
- 2019Hyperbolic Image Embeddingscited by 219
- 2018Hyperspherical Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 188
- 2024MambaOut: Do We Really Need Mamba for Vision?cited by 142
- 2025Extending the Context of Pretrained LLMs by Dropping Their Positional Embeddingscited by 23
- 2026ZACH-ViT: Regime-Dependent Inductive Bias in Compact Vision Transformers for Medical Imagingcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.