mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Independent Manipulation: Individual Fairness-aware Strategic Classification with Peer Imitation

arXiv 2606.00827 ↗First posted 30 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Strategic classification (SC) investigates scenarios where agents manipulate their features to obtain favorable decisions from predictive models. Existing fairness-aware SC approaches primarily focus on group fairness and typically assume that agents respond independently. However, when individual fairness is required, ensuring similar individuals receive similar outcomes, agents' manipulation becomes interdependent: an agent's preferred manipulation depends on the neighborhoods' outcomes. This induces a mismatch between classical SC formulations and fairness-aware decision settings, where independent models no longer accurately characterize strategic manipulations. To address this issue, we introduce individual fairness-aware strategic classification (IFSC), a framework that models peer-driven manipulation arising from individual fairness, where agents imitate nearby positively decided peers to obtain favorable outcomes. IFSC characterizes strategic manipulation as similarity-based imitation toward visible accepted peers and learns classifiers under the resulting post-manipulation distributions. To account for uncertainty in peer observability, IFSC employs a robust learning process that introduces stochastic perturbations during manipulation simulation. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that IFSC improves individual-fairness consistency and mitigates imitation-induced distortions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.

Builds on

16 of 30 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 256
  2. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
  3. 2018The Social Cost of Strategic Classificationcited by 105
  4. 2018The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulationcited by 75
  5. 2021Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?cited by 53
  6. 2022Performative Powercited by 42
  7. 2019What does it mean to solve the problem of discrimination in hiring? Social, technical and legal perspectives from the UK on automated hiring systemscited by 38
  8. 2018Individual Fairness in Hindsightcited by 32
  9. 2020From Predictions to Decisions: Using Lookahead Regularizationcited by 19
  10. 2023Causal Strategic Learning with Competitive Selectioncited by 9
  11. 2022Addressing Strategic Manipulation Disparities in Fair Classificationcited by 8
  12. 2024Who's Gaming the System? A Causally-Motivated Approach for Detecting Strategic Adaptationcited by 5
4 more
  1. 2017Behavior Revealed in Mobile Phone Usage Predicts Loan Repaymentcited by 4
  2. 2025Breaking the Gradient Barrier: Unveiling Large Language Models for Strategic Classificationcited by 4
  3. 2023Certification of Distributional Individual Fairnesscited by 2
  4. 2025Correct-By-Construction: Certified Individual Fairness through Neural Network Trainingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.