mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interaction-Centered Intelligence: Toward an Interaction-Based Theory of Human-AI Co-Creation

arXiv 2606.00807 ↗First posted 30 May 2026cs.AI cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional artificial intelligence has largely conceptualized intelligence as isolated computation occurring within bounded agents. Across classical AI, machine learning, and many generative systems, the dominant unit of analysis remains the individual model or autonomous system evaluated through outputs, benchmarks, prediction accuracy, or optimization performance. While these approaches have produced major advances, they often under-theorize the role of interaction in the emergence of intelligence, creativity, meaning, and adaptive behavior. This paper proposes interaction as the primary unit of analysis for co-creative AI and interaction-centered intelligence more broadly. Drawing from distributed cognition, embodied cognition, enaction, participatory sense-making, human-computer interaction, and computational creativity, the paper traces a historical progression toward increasingly relational accounts of intelligence. Building upon prior work in Creative Sense-Making, quantified co-creation, and co-creative systems such as the Drawing Apprentice and AI Drawing Partner, it argues that intelligence emerges through evolving interaction dynamics among agents, environments, and socio-technical systems rather than solely through internal computation. The paper introduces Interaction-Centered Intelligence as a framework for understanding human-AI co-creation, collaborative emergence, adaptive participation, and interactional dynamics. Rather than evaluating intelligence solely through generated outputs, the framework emphasizes interaction trajectories, coordination patterns, participatory engagement, adaptive regulation, and interactional drift unfolding through time. Implications for explainable co-creative AI, hybrid intelligence, enactive AI, and future human-AI systems are discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.

Builds on

14 of 49 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  3. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  4. 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 182
  5. 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 86
  6. 2022Designing Creative AI Partners with COFI: A Framework for Modeling Interaction in Human-AI Co-Creative Systemscited by 59
  7. 2019An Interaction Framework for Studying Co-Creative AIcited by 19
  8. 2024Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Taskcited by 17
  9. 2025Collaborating with AI Agents: Field Experiments on Teamwork, Productivity, and Performancecited by 14
  10. 2019Deep Learning in a Computational Model for Conceptual Shifts in a Co-Creative Design Systemcited by 5
  11. 2021Human-AI interaction: An emerging interdisciplinary domain for enabling human-centered AIcited by 3
  12. 2025AI Drawing Partner: Co-Creative Drawing Agent and Research Platform to Model Co-Creationcited by 3
2 more
  1. 2018Deep Learning for Identifying Potential Conceptual Shifts for Co-creative Drawingcited by 1
  2. 2025From Augmentation to Symbiosis: A Review of Human-AI Collaboration Frameworks, Performance, and Perilscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.