mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agentic Authoring of Interactive Multiview Visualizations in Genomics

arXiv 2606.00370 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Multimodal and embodied agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Diverse genomics data, scientific questions, and analysis tasks typically demand highly specialized visualizations. Therefore, users often must customize or author new ones tailored to their data. Existing tools are usually either limited in customization or require substantial learning or programming, and even expressive tools assume visualization expertise many users lack. Agentic and large language model (LLM) approaches are increasingly applied to complex scientific tasks, including visualization. Natural-language conversational interfaces offer a promising path to democratizing the authoring of complex visualizations. In the context of genomics, these approaches face additional challenges: genomics visualizations typically integrate heterogeneous data types and are composed of multiple linked interactive views. These challenges motivate more structured LLM-based schemes. We first characterize where vanilla LLM generation succeeds and fails for genomics visualization, identifying eight quality dimensions. We then compare six schemes--direct generation, a fixed pipeline, and four agentic configurations varying in the number of specialist agents and the presence of a reviewer--across 159 cases spanning three levels of query ambiguity and specification complexity. All schemes use the Gosling visualization grammar as structured output. Agentic iteration substantially improves perceived quality over both baselines, while more complex agent architectures yield no additional benefit. We discuss implications for designing agentic systems for domain-specific visualization authoring. All supplemental materials are available at https://osf.io/uqe83.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 27 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

27 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026MultiVis-Agent: A Multi-Agent Framework with Logic Rules for Reliable and Comprehensive Cross-Modal Data Visualization26 Jan
  2. 2025nvAgent: Automated Data Visualization from Natural Language via Collaborative Agent Workflow7 Feb

Other references · 25

  1. 2023LIDA: A Tool for Automatic Generation of Grammar-Agnostic Visualizations and Infographics using Large Language Modelscited by 82
  2. 2023ChartGPT: Leveraging LLMs to Generate Charts from Abstract Natural Languagecited by 73
  3. 2023Chat2VIS: Generating Data Visualisations via Natural Language using ChatGPT, Codex and GPT-3 Large Language Modelscited by 59
  4. 2024VisEval: A Benchmark for Data Visualization in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 45
  5. 2021Collecting and Characterizing Natural Language Utterances for Specifying Data Visualizationscited by 31
  6. 2023Natural Language Dataset Generation Framework for Visualizations Powered by Large Language Modelscited by 20
  7. 2023How Good is ChatGPT in Giving Advice on Your Visualization Design?cited by 20
  8. 2024Are LLMs ready for Visualization?cited by 16
  9. 2024Prompt4Vis: Prompting Large Language Models with Example Mining and Schema Filtering for Tabular Data Visualizationcited by 14
  10. 2025InterChat: Enhancing Generative Visual Analytics using Multimodal Interactionscited by 13
  11. 2024Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Visualization System: A Study on Self-Regulated Learning in Educationcited by 12
  12. 2024DracoGPT: Extracting Visualization Design Preferences from Large Language Modelscited by 12
13 more
  1. 2025Probing the Visualization Literacy of Vision Language Models: the Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 11
  2. 2025Charts-of-Thought: Enhancing LLM Visualization Literacy Through Structured Data Extractioncited by 6
  3. 2019Tasks, Techniques, and Tools for Genomic Data Visualizationcited by 5
  4. 2023Draco 2: An Extensible Platform to Model Visualization Designcited by 5
  5. 2025AuraGenome: An LLM-Powered Framework for On-the-Fly Reusable and Scalable Circular Genome Visualizationscited by 5
  6. 2025Understanding Why ChatGPT Outperforms Humans in Visualization Design Advicecited by 5
  7. 2023Too Many Cooks: Exploring How Graphical Perception Studies Influence Visualization Recommendations in Dracocited by 3
  8. 2025Qualitative Study for LLM-assisted Design Study Process: Strategies, Challenges, and Rolescited by 3
  9. 2023Understanding the Research-Practice Gap in Visualization Design Guidelinescited by 1
  10. 2025YAC: Bridging Natural Language and Interactive Visual Exploration with Generative AI for Biomedical Data Discoverycited by 1
  11. 2026Talk Me Through It: Developing Effective Systems for Chart Authoringcited by 1
  12. 2026VegaChat: A Robust Framework for LLM-Based Chart Generation and Assessmentcited by 1
  13. 2026Automatic Synthesis of Visualization Design Knowledge Basescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025VizGenie: Toward Self-Refining, Domain-Aware Workflows for Next-Generation Scientific Visualization
  2. 2025PlotGen: Multi-Agent LLM-based Scientific Data Visualization via Multimodal Feedback
  3. 2024MatPlotAgent: Method and Evaluation for LLM-Based Agentic Scientific Data Visualization
  4. 2025CoDA: Agentic Systems for Collaborative Data Visualization
  5. 2026SciVisAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Scientific Data Analysis and Visualization Agents
  6. 2026Exploring LLM Agent Designs and Interaction Modalities for Scientific Visualization
  7. 2026Beyond Static Charts: Can Language and Vision Language Models Generate Interactive Data Visualization Interfaces?
  8. 2025VizGen: Data Exploration and Visualization from Natural Language via a Multi-Agent AI Architecture