mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Good is ChatGPT in Giving Advice on Your Visualization Design?

arXiv 2310.09617 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2023cs.HCcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data visualization creators often lack formal training, resulting in a knowledge gap in design practice. Large language models such as ChatGPT, with their vast internet-scale training data, offer transformative potential to address this gap. In this study, we used both qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate how well ChatGPT can address visualization design questions. First, we quantitatively compared the ChatGPT-generated responses with anonymous online Human replies to data visualization questions on the VisGuides user forum. Next, we conducted a qualitative user study examining the reactions and attitudes of practitioners toward ChatGPT as a visualization design assistant. Participants were asked to bring their visualizations and design questions and received feedback from both Human experts and ChatGPT in randomized order. Our findings from both studies underscore ChatGPT's strengths, particularly its ability to rapidly generate diverse design options, while also highlighting areas for improvement, such as nuanced contextual understanding and fluid interaction dynamics beyond the chat interface. Drawing on these insights, we discuss design considerations for future LLM-based design feedback systems.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 8; 2026: 5.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024VisEval: A Benchmark for Data Visualization in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 43
  2. 2024HAIChart: Human and AI Paired Visualization Systemcited by 26
  3. 2025AstroVisBench: A Code Benchmark for Scientific Computing and Visualization in Astronomycited by 13
  4. 2024Vi(E)va LLM! A Conceptual Stack for Evaluating and Interpreting Generative AI-based Visualizationscited by 10
  5. 2024Can GPT-4 Models Detect Misleading Visualizations?cited by 10
  6. 2025Probing the Visualization Literacy of Vision Language Models: the Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 9
  7. 2025DeepVIS: Bridging Natural Language and Data Visualization Through Step-wise Reasoningcited by 8
  8. 2025Charts-of-Thought: Enhancing LLM Visualization Literacy Through Structured Data Extractioncited by 6
  9. 2025Understanding Why ChatGPT Outperforms Humans in Visualization Design Advicecited by 5
  10. 2024ChatGPT in Data Visualization Education: A Student Perspectivecited by 3
  11. 2024V-RECS, a Low-Cost LLM4VIS Recommender with Explanations, Captioning and Suggestionscited by 3
  12. 2024Charting the Future: Using Chart Question-Answering for Scalable Evaluation of LLM-Driven Data Visualizationscited by 2
8 more
  1. 2025Evaluating Compliance with Visualization Guidelines in Diagrams for Scientific Publications Using Large Vision Language Modelscited by 1
  2. 2026From Answer Givers to Design Mentors: Guiding LLMs with the Cognitive Apprenticeship Modelcited by 1
  3. 2025Automated Visualization Makeovers with LLMscited by 0
  4. 2025SVG Decomposition for Enhancing Large Multimodal Models Visualization Comprehension: A Study with Floor Planscited by 0
  5. 2026De-rendering, Reasoning, and Repairing Charts with Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
  6. 2026Disrupting Cognitive Passivity: Rethinking AI-Assisted Data Literacy through Cognitive Alignmentcited by 0
  7. 2026Agentic Authoring of Interactive Multiview Visualizations in Genomicscited by 0
  8. 2026InSight: A Benchmark for Agentic Claim Verification in Interactive Visualizationscited by 0