mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agentic Transformers Provably Learn to Search via Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2606.00183 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.LG cs.AI math.OCcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Reinforcement learning for LLM agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Tree search is a central abstraction behind many language-agent reasoning and decision-making tasks: agents must explore actions, remember failures, and backtrack toward promising alternatives. Yet, we lack a theoretical understanding of how transformer-based policies acquire such search capabilities from the training dynamics of reinforcement learning (RL). We study this question in a stochastic k-ary tree environment, where an agentic transformer observes only its trajectory history through interaction and receives a terminal reward for reaching a hidden leaf goal node. We first construct a two-head transformer that implements randomized depth-first search (DFS): one head tracks previous actions, while the other detects failure outcomes and triggers backtracking. We then analyze the training dynamics of policy gradient under a depth-wise curriculum, showing that this same DFS mechanism emerges in stages from sparse reinforcement feedback without expert demonstrations. The resulting policy exhibits depth generalization: after training only on depth-1 and depth-2 trees, it succeeds on deeper full trees. We further show that, under imbalanced goal distributions, discounting the return leads to a ranked DFS policy that prioritizes higher-probability branches. Overall, our results identify a mechanistic normal form for transformer-based search, in which attention heads specialize and cooperate to extract decision-relevant traces from context and convert them into agentic action selection via RL training.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

3 of 27 references.

References · 3

  1. 2026On the Emergence of Implicit Curriculum in RLVR Learning Dynamicscited by 10
  2. 2026Outcome-Based RL Provably Leads Transformers to Reason, but Only With the Right Datacited by 6
  3. 2025Provable Benefit of Curriculum in Transformer Tree-Reasoning Post-Trainingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AT2PO: Agentic Turn-based Policy Optimization via Tree Search
  2. 2026Reason in Chains, Learn in Trees: Self-Rectification and Grafting for Multi-turn Agent Policy Optimization
  3. 2025Tree Search for LLM Agent Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2023Emergent Agentic Transformer from Chain of Hindsight Experience
  5. 2026GraphOPD: Graph-Augmented On-Policy Distillation for LLM Agents
  6. 2026Learning Agentic Policy from Action Guidance
  7. 2023Forecaster: Towards Temporally Abstract Tree-Search Planning from Pixels
  8. 2025The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey