mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

SOCO: Benchmarking Semantic Object Correspondence in Vision Foundation Models

arXiv 2605.31597 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Measuring structured object understanding in vision foundation models remains challenging due to inconsistent evaluation protocols and limited part-level supervision. Semantic correspondence (SC) evaluates this capability by testing whether object parts can be matched across instances and categories under large variations in appearance, viewpoint, and geometry. To enable a systematic SC evaluation, we introduce SOCO, a new benchmark for Semantic Object Correspondence that introduces a taxonomy of correspondence types and provides consistent, functionally meaningful keypoint annotations across 100 categories and over 1M correspondence pairs. In addition, SOCO includes keypoint language descriptions, enabling the evaluation of large vision-language models (LVLMs) and their fine-grained part-level understanding. Comprehensive experiments reveal that (i) vision foundation backbones encode strong semantic structure but transfer correspondences poorly across related categories and only partially capture object-part position, (ii) LVLMs are stronger at text-prompted part localization than at visual-reference cross-image matching, exposing a gap between language-grounded localization and fine-grained visual correspondence, and (iii) correspondence performance predicts performance on dense downstream tasks, including segmentation, tracking, 3D pose estimation, and 3D detection, more strongly than ImageNet classification. Together, these findings position SOCO as a benchmark for structured, part-level representation quality in vision and multimodal foundation models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

65 of 83 references.

References · 65

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,777
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,550
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,857
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,827
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,364
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,915
  8. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,499
  9. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,027
  10. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,536
  11. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,435
  12. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,363
38 more
  1. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,314
  2. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,692
  3. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,663
  4. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,204
  5. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,118
  6. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,057
  7. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,795
  8. 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,452
  9. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,355
  10. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,018
  11. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 895
  12. 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 879
  13. 2024Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spacescited by 588
  14. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 562
  15. 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 534
  16. 2019Normalized Object Coordinate Space for Category-Level 6D Object Pose and Size Estimationcited by 492
  17. 2021ARKitScenes: A Diverse Real-World Dataset For 3D Indoor Scene Understanding Using Mobile RGB-D Datacited by 445
  18. 2023Emergent Correspondence from Image Diffusioncited by 440
  19. 2021How Much Can CLIP Benefit Vision-and-Language Tasks?cited by 321
  20. 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 319
  21. 2023A Tale of Two Features: Stable Diffusion Complements DINO for Zero-Shot Semantic Correspondencecited by 298
  22. 2022TAP-Vid: A Benchmark for Tracking Any Point in a Videocited by 259
  23. 2023What does CLIP know about a red circle? Visual prompt engineering for VLMscited by 216
  24. 2023Diffusion Hyperfeatures: Searching Through Time and Space for Semantic Correspondencecited by 212
  25. 2024Probing the 3D Awareness of Visual Foundation Modelscited by 176
  26. 2023AM-RADIO: Agglomerative Vision Foundation Model -- Reduce All Domains Into Onecited by 167
  27. 2022CroCo v2: Improved Cross-view Completion Pre-training for Stereo Matching and Optical Flowcited by 165
  28. 2022Omni3D: A Large Benchmark and Model for 3D Object Detection in the Wildcited by 159
  29. 2019SPair-71k: A Large-scale Benchmark for Semantic Correspondencecited by 142
  30. 2018Dense Object Nets: Learning Dense Visual Object Descriptors By and For Robotic Manipulationcited by 140
  31. 2017Convolutional neural network architecture for geometric matchingcited by 138
  32. 2021AP-10K: A Benchmark for Animal Pose Estimation in the Wildcited by 123
  33. 2024RADIOv2.5: Improved Baselines for Agglomerative Vision Foundation Modelscited by 89
  34. 2023Telling Left from Right: Identifying Geometry-Aware Semantic Correspondencecited by 85
  35. 2021DiscoBox: Weakly Supervised Instance Segmentation and Semantic Correspondence from Box Supervisioncited by 59
  36. 2015Proposal Flowcited by 57
  37. 2023NAVI: Category-Agnostic Image Collections with High-Quality 3D Shape and Pose Annotationscited by 53
  38. 2023Animal3D: A Comprehensive Dataset of 3D Animal Pose and Shapecited by 43

50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Towards Robust Semantic Correspondence: A Benchmark and Insights
  2. 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
  3. 2025Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation
  4. 2024CALICO: Part-Focused Semantic Co-Segmentation with Large Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: From Evaluation to Diagnosis
  6. 2025Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models: Benchmarking Object-Centric Spatial Understanding
  7. 2026SceneBench: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Vision-Language Understanding of 3D Scenes
  8. 2025VLM-FO1: Bridging the Gap Between High-Level Reasoning and Fine-Grained Perception in VLMs