mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Discovering Thermodynamically Admissible Dissipation Potentials via Grammar-Based Symbolic Regression

arXiv 2605.31532 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cond-mat.soft cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Constitutive laws for inelastic materials must satisfy strict thermodynamic admissibility requirements, yet current data-driven approaches sacrifice interpretability, even when formal guarantees are provided by physics-encoded architectures. We propose a symbolic regression framework for the data-driven discovery of dissipation potentials governing the evolution of internal variables within the Generalized Standard Materials (GSM) formalism. Starting from the Clausius--Duhem inequality, we enforce the thermodynamic requirements, convexity and non-negativity, that the dual dissipation potential must satisfy to guarantee non-negative mechanical dissipation. These requirements are formulated in the general subdifferential setting, encompassing rate-dependent (viscoelastic) and viscoplastic dissipative mechanisms, including potentials with genuine elastic domains, within a unified framework. Candidate potentials are generated by a composition-extended convexity-preserving grammar that guarantees thermodynamic admissibility by construction. The framework is validated on synthetic datasets spanning Newtonian, power-law, and Bingham viscoplastic ground truths under process and measurement noise, and on experimental oscillatory shear measurements of a synthetic elastomer across multiple strain amplitudes and frequencies, where the discovered potentials reproduce the amplitude-dependent softening of the dynamic moduli and outperform a calibrated linear Zener baseline.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 68 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  2. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
  3. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
  4. 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
  5. 2024A review on data-driven constitutive laws for solidscited by 35
  6. 2024Viscoelasticty with physics-augmented neural networks: Model formulation and training methods without prescribed internal variablescited by 17
  7. 2023Data-driven anisotropic finite viscoelasticity using neural ordinary differential equationscited by 16
  8. 2023Viscoelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks (vCANNs) - a framework for data-driven anisotropic nonlinear finite viscoelasticitycited by 13
  9. 2025Can KAN CANs? Input-convex Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) as hyperelastic constitutive artificial neural networks (CANs)cited by 13
  10. 2022Automatic generation of interpretable hyperelastic material models by symbolic regressioncited by 12
  11. 2023Theory and implementation of inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networkscited by 12
  12. 2023Discovering interpretable elastoplasticity models via the neural polynomial method enabled symbolic regressionscited by 10
6 more
  1. 2024Accounting for plasticity: An extension of inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networkscited by 6
  2. 2024Automated model discovery of finite strain elastoplasticity from uniaxial experimentscited by 6
  3. 2026Inelastic Constitutive Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A generalized framework for automated discovery of interpretable inelastic material modelscited by 6
  4. 2023Physics-constrained symbolic model discovery for polyconvex incompressible hyperelastic materialscited by 5
  5. 2025A physics-augmented neural network framework for finite strain incompressible viscoelasticitycited by 5
  6. 2025Identification of Empirical Constitutive Models for Age-Hardenable Aluminium Alloy and High-Chromium Martensitic Steel Using Symbolic Regressioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.