Multi-Turn Multi-Agent Dialogue for Collaborative Reconstruction Improves VLM Performance on Spatial Reasoning, But Only Barely
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Robots operating in diverse environments rely on visual input to interpret objects and spatial layouts. In human-collaborative tasks, they are expected to communicate this understanding through language. Vision-language models (VLMs) support robotic tasks involving visual interpretation, question answering, and instruction following, but their capabilities in collaborative dialogue tasks requiring spatial reasoning remain underexplored. We study this gap through a collaborative structure-building task that combines visual interpretation, grounding, language-guided interaction, and action generation. We develop a framework in which VLMs use dialogue to reconstruct a target structure from visual and textual inputs. We evaluate open-weight and closed VLMs across interaction settings, input modalities, and image representations. Results show that spatial reasoning over visual representations remains difficult for the evaluated VLMs. Detailed text representations of the target yield higher reconstruction success across modality conditions, while decomposed image representations improve performance. These findings reveal limits in visual spatial grounding and grounded instruction generation for collaborative VLM agents.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.
Builds on
8 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models3 Jun
- 2025Visual Planning: Let's Think Only with Images16 May
- 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models25 Mar
Other references · 5
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
- 2025Interleave-VLA: Enhancing Robot Manipulation with Interleaved Image-Text Instructionscited by 50
- 2023GameEval: Evaluating LLMs on Conversational Gamescited by 35
- 2025TextArenacited by 24
- 2024Towards No-Code Programming of Cobots: Experiments with Code Synthesis by Large Code Models for Conversational Programmingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Seeing Across Views: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning of Vision-Language Models in Robotic Scenes
- 2026SpatialAct: Probing Spatial Reasoning-to-Action Capabilities of VLM Agents in 3D Scenes
- 2026WM-VLM: Probing Internal World Models for Interleaved Visual-Textual Reasoning
- 2026ESPIRE: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Embodied Spatial Reasoning of Vision-Language Models
- 2025SIRI-Bench: Challenging VLMs' Spatial Intelligence through Complex Reasoning Tasks
- 2025SpaRE: Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Synthetic Data
- 2024SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models
- 2026MultihopSpatial: Multi-hop Compositional Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision-Language Model