TASER: Translation Assessment via Systematic Evaluation and Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce TASER (Translation Assessment via Systematic Evaluation and Reasoning), a metric that uses Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) for automated translation quality assessment. TASER harnesses the explicit reasoning capabilities of LRMs to conduct systematic, step-by-step evaluation of translation quality. We evaluate TASER on the WMT24 Metrics Shared Task across both reference-based and reference-free scenarios, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance. In system-level evaluation, TASER achieves the highest soft pairwise accuracy in both reference-based and reference-free settings, outperforming all existing metrics. At the segment level, TASER maintains competitive performance with our reference-free variant ranking as the top-performing metric among all reference-free approaches. Our experiments reveal that structured prompting templates yield superior results with LRMs compared to the open-ended approaches that proved optimal for traditional LLMs. We evaluate o3, a large reasoning model from OpenAI, with varying reasoning efforts, providing insights into the relationship between reasoning depth and evaluation quality. The explicit reasoning process in LRMs offers interpretability and visibility, addressing a key limitation of existing automated metrics. Our results demonstrate that Large Reasoning Models show a measurable advancement in translation quality assessment, combining improved accuracy with transparent evaluation across diverse language pairs.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.
Builds on
8 of 16 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 7
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
- 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
- 2023Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Enginecited by 172
- 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 143
- 2025The Hidden Risks of Large Reasoning Models: A Safety Assessment of R1cited by 89
- 2023ChatGPT MT: Competitive for High- (but not Low-) Resource Languagescited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translationcited by 2
- 2026Beyond Scalar Scores: Reinforcement Learning for Error-Aware Quality Estimation of Machine Translationcited by 0
- 2026Model-Based Quality Assessment for Massively Multilingual Parallel Datacited by 0
- 2026Model-Based Quality Assessment for Massively Multilingual Parallel Data29 May 2026
- 2026What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation13 May 2026
- 2026Beyond Scalar Scores: Reinforcement Learning for Error-Aware Quality Estimation of Machine Translation9 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Are Large Reasoning Models Good Translation Evaluators? Analysis and Performance Boost
- 2025How Well Do Large Reasoning Models Translate? A Comprehensive Evaluation for Multi-Domain Machine Translation
- 2025TransEvalnia: Reasoning-based Evaluation and Ranking of Translations
- 2025Test-Time Scaling of Reasoning Models for Machine Translation
- 2026Unlocking Fine-Grained Translation Quality Estimation in LRMs through Mutually Boosting Implicit and Explicit Reasoning
- 2026Unlocking Reasoning Capability on Machine Translation in Large Language Models
- 2025TASE: Token Awareness and Structured Evaluation for Multilingual Language Models
- 2025Estonian WinoGrande Dataset: Comparative Analysis of LLM Performance on Human and Machine Translation