TraceGraph: Shared Decision Landscapes for Diagnosing and Improving Agent Trajectories
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Agent benchmarks increasingly record rich interaction trajectories, yet evaluation often reduces each rollout to a pass rate or reward score. We introduce TraceGraph, a graph-based framework that turns released multi-model agent trajectories into shared decision landscapes. For each task, TraceGraph builds a graph over observable action-observation states from pooled rollouts before model identity is introduced. It then overlays outcome-informed productive cores and trap regions, and summarizes each rollout with three events: Access, Trap exposure, and Repair. Across trajectories spanning five benchmark splits, TraceGraph profiles reveal navigation differences hidden by aggregate scores and show that splits differ in whether they reward avoiding traps or recovering from them. The same TraceGraph landscape also motivates a trap-aware recovery pipeline for SWE-bench: aruntime detector fires on states matching historical trap regions, then lightweight continuation policies are evaluated from the same prefix. On fired states, the best pooled single-factor policy raises official resolved rate from 40.4% to 43.5% on the per-provider fired subset and from 41.0% to 44.8% on common-fired instances, with provider-specific active components. Overall, TraceGraph provides a process vocabulary for asking what agent benchmarks test, where models diverge on a shared landscape, and how failure regions can guide downstream improvement.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.
Builds on
19 of 22 references.
References · 19
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,197
- 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 558
7 more
- 2025MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP Serverscited by 101
- 2025Process-Centric Analysis of Agentic Software Systemscited by 24
- 2026Benchmark Test-Time Scaling of General LLM Agentscited by 24
- 2025Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLMcited by 21
- 2025The Shape of Reasoning: Topological Analysis of Reasoning Traces in Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2026SliceGraph: Mapping Process Isomers in Multi-Run Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 2
- 2026Thinking Traps in Long Chain-of-Thought: A Measurable Study and Trap-Aware Adaptive Restartcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026AgentPProf: Semantic Profiler for Long Horizon AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026AgentPProf: Semantic Profiler for Long Horizon AI Agents14 Sep 2026