mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EvoDefense: Co-Evolving Black-Box Defense with Large Language Models

arXiv 2605.31140 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.CR cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) remain highly vulnerable to diverse attacks, particularly in black-box settings where the internals of target models are inaccessible. Existing black-box defenses typically rely on pre-defined filtering heuristics, which often fail to generalize to unseen attack types and target model architectures. We introduce EvoDefense, an experience-guided co-evolving black-box defense paradigm. EvoDefense employs a guard LLM to detect malicious queries and an experience memory module to accumulate defense knowledge from previous interactions. At the core of EvoDefense is a continuous attack-defense evolution loop, where an attack generator and the guard model iteratively refine their attack strategies and defense policies through experience-guided optimization. This design enables EvoDefense to generalize across unseen attacks and target models without retraining. Experiments on HarmBench, AdvBench, and AlpacaEval show that EvoDefense achieves consistently strong defense performance across seven popular models and five representative LLM attacks, while preserving competitive general capabilities. On HarmBench, EvoDefense reduces the attack success rate (ASR) of AutoDAN-turbo on Gemini-3-flash and LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct from 29.4% and 43.4% to 8.4% and 6.2%, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

24 of 49 references.

References · 24

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  5. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  6. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  7. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  8. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  9. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  10. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  11. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
  12. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 785
12 more
  1. 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 651
  2. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
  3. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
  4. 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 469
  5. 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Promptingcited by 266
  6. 2024AutoDAN-Turbo: A Lifelong Agent for Strategy Self-Exploration to Jailbreak LLMscited by 199
  7. 2025Qwen3Guard Technical Reportcited by 155
  8. 2022Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Promptscited by 137
  9. 2024Antidote: Post-fine-tuning Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuningcited by 72
  10. 2025From Hard Refusals to Safe-Completions: Toward Output-Centric Safety Trainingcited by 52
  11. 2025SafeWork-R1: Coevolving Safety and Intelligence under the AI-45circ Lawcited by 14
  12. 2025PEARL: Towards Permutation-Resilient LLMscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.