DEM: A Distilled Explanation Model for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Physiological Sensor Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anomaly detection in physiological sensor data from Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) can be caused by sensor faults, network disruptions, or missing data, leading to false alarms. Hence, it demands both high predictive accuracy and clinically interpretable explanations. Existing approaches rely either on black-box models that achieve strong performance but offer no transparency, or on post-prediction explanation methods such as SHAP and LIME. In this paper, we propose the Distilled Explanation Model (DEM), a three-stage glass-box framework that distills the non-linear knowledge of a gradient boosting expert into an interpretable decision tree operating on residuals relative to a linear baseline, so that the explanation is not an approximation but the prediction itself. DEM introduces a novel distillation fidelity metric that quantifies how faithfully the explanation tree captures the expert model's non-linear contribution, providing a principled measure of explanation trustworthiness absent from prior interpretable models. Evaluated across four physiological datasets, including MIMIC-IV, WESAD, eICU, and an in-house SmartNet WBAN corpus, DEM achieves an AUC of 0.9964 on clinical contextual anomaly detection and 0.9047 on wearable stress detection while producing human-readable if-then rules at a controllable depth. Inference requires 0.17ms per 1000 samples, rendering DEM 1235x faster than SHAP-based post-hoc explanation and suitable for real-time physiological monitoring. Ablation studies confirm that the XGBoost distillation step provides measurable gains over naive residual fitting, and depth-sensitivity analysis demonstrates an explicit, user-controlled accuracy-interpretability trade-off unique to DEM among existing intrinsically interpretable models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.
Builds on
8 of 33 references.
References · 8
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
- 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 403
- 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 243
- 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 230
- 2022Knowledge Distillation Decision Tree for Unravelling Black-box Machine Learning Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.