Rationalize: Shared Semantic Reasoning for Human-AI Alignment
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce Rationalize, a role-pair framework for shared semantic reasoning between humans and AI models in data-driven sensemaking. Building on ideas in human-machine teaming and critical thinking, we conceptualize human-AI interaction as a series of complementary role pairs (Explorer-Guide, Investigator-Informant, Teacher-Student, Judge-Advocate) operating in a shared reasoning space. In this space, human analysts and AI models (such as LLMs) make purposes, questions, assumptions, evidence, inferences, and implications explicit, facilitating alignment not only at the output level but at the level of rationalization of intent and action by each side. We relate these role pairs to the bidirectional human-AI alignment framework, illustrating how "aligning AI to humans" and "aligning humans to AI" differ by role, and sketch a collaborative research agenda for alignment design and assessment using element-level and role-specific approaches.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 1 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
1 of 16 references.
References · 1
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignmentcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Collaborative Causal Sensemaking: Closing the Complementarity Gap in Human-AI Decision Support
- 2024Concept Alignment
- 2026Align AI to Dynamic Human-AI Workflows
- 2024ValueCompass: A Framework for Measuring Contextual Value Alignment Between Human and LLMs
- 2024Towards Dialogues for Joint Human-AI Reasoning and Value Alignment
- 2025Gricean Norms as a Basis for Effective Collaboration
- 2025Theory of Mind in Action: The Instruction Inference Task in Dynamic Human-Agent Collaboration
- 2024Explanation, Debate, Align: A Weak-to-Strong Framework for Language Model Generalization