HPO: Hysteretic Policy Optimization for Stable and Efficient Training under Sparse-Reward Regime
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate a narrow but common failure mode of GRPO-style reinforcement learning in the context of sparse verifiable rewards: early updates contain more responses with negative advantages than those with positive advantages, while response-level length normalization ties the magnitude of the update to the length of the output. We propose Hysteretic Policy Optimization (HPO), a minimal modification of GRPO that reduces the weight of negative-advantage updates and replaces per-response length normalization with mean-length normalization. We further introduce Adaptive HPO (A-HPO), which sets the hysteretic weight based on batch-level advantage-sign statistics, thereby removing the need for tuning a fixed hysteretic weight. In our TeleLogs and Countdown experiments, A-HPO improves the reward per update compared to GRPO, with the largest gains in early sparse reward regimes. On TeleLogs, A-HPO achieves a final reward of 0.84, outperforming SAPO by 5%, GSPO by 11%, and GRPO by 15%, while maintaining a comparable response-length. On Countdown, A-HPO achieves the largest gains in initial and most difficult configurations across 1.5B-7B models. Ablation studies on the hysteretic weight show that the gains of A-HPO come from better balancing the contributions of positive and negative advantages compared to positive-only or fully symmetric updates.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 14 references.
References · 11
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
- 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillationcited by 285
- 2025A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforcecited by 141
- 2025Rewarding the Unlikely: Lifting GRPO Beyond Distribution Sharpeningcited by 78
- 2025RewardMap: Tackling Sparse Rewards in Fine-grained Visual Reasoning via Multi-Stage Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
- 2026DenseGRPO: From Sparse to Dense Reward for Flow Matching Model Alignmentcited by 20
- 2025Reasoning Language Models for Root Cause Analysis in 5G Wireless Networkscited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization
- 2026GOPO: Policy Optimization using Ranked Rewards
- 2025Advantage Shaping as Surrogate Reward Maximization: Unifying Pass@K Policy Gradients
- 2025GHPO: Adaptive Guidance for Stable and Efficient LLM Reinforcement Learning
- 2025GRPOformer: Advancing Hyperparameter Optimization via Group Relative Policy Optimization
- 2026How Off-Policy Can GRPO Be? Mu-GRPO for Efficient LLM Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards: GRPO's Effective Loss, Dynamics, and Success Amplification
- 2025BNPO: Beta Normalization Policy Optimization