Certified Policy Optimisation for Nested Causal Bandits via PAC-Bayes Risk
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Critical sequential decisions are rarely single-timescale: a strategic decision causally shapes the context in which every subsequent tactical choice is made; standard bandit and reinforcement-learning theory does not capture this causal coupling between timescales. We formalise the problem class as Nested Contextual Causal Bandits (NCCBs), a hierarchical SCM where each level's action sets the next level's context distribution, and propose Nested Causal Thompson Sampling (NCTS), which draws one mechanism-factorised belief per episode and acts recursively under it. Our main theoretical result is a causal PAC-Bayesian excess-risk bound that certifies any candidate deployment policy from historic data alone, off-policy and anytime, answering the deployment question: can we trust this agent here, and at what risk? Experiments on a hierarchical SCM show that, against a matched RFF-GP joint regression on the same function class, the factorised SCM-mechanism posterior transfers significantly better zero-shot under exogenous distribution shifts, the recursive meta-to-inner commit significantly dominates the joint-commit alternative in distribution, and the certificate significantly contracts as offline data accumulates. Combining these results, we establish progressive certified handover, a safe-deployment method: each timescale flips from a legacy controller to NCTS when gains can be certified, independently of the others.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
14 of 29 references.
References · 14
- 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 256
- 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
- 2014Learning to Optimize via Information-Directed Samplingcited by 168
- 2017Safe Policy Improvement with Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 144
- 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 117
- 2024Robust agents learn causal world modelscited by 81
- 2021DAGs with No Curl: An Efficient DAG Structure Learning Approachcited by 53
- 2014Near-optimal Reinforcement Learning in Factored MDPscited by 41
- 2021Hierarchical Bayesian Banditscited by 35
- 2023BayesDAG: Gradient-Based Posterior Inference for Causal Discoverycited by 33
- 2022Online PAC-Bayes Learningcited by 22
- 2022Deep Hierarchy in Banditscited by 19
Built on by
Not cited yet.