mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CrystalXRD-Bench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for XRD Peak Indexing Across Diverse Crystalline Materials

arXiv 2605.29446 ↗First posted 28 May 2026cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Miller-index identification from powder XRD patterns requires capabilities untested by existing multimodal benchmarks: the model must read a narrow peak location from a rendered scientific curve and then connect that observation to multi-step crystallographic reasoning. We introduce CrystalXRD-Bench, a 250-sample benchmark built from 10 public crystallographic databases for a single task: recover the full set of HKLs contributing to the highest-intensity peak in an XRD pattern. Each sample pairs the rendered XRD image with the source CIF text and chemical formula, so visual extraction errors and reasoning errors can be examined side by side. We evaluate seven vision-language models. The best Jaccard score is 0.5888 (GPT-5.4) with an exact-match rate of 37.6%, yet six of seven models remain below Jaccard 0.50; the task is far from solved. Error patterns vary systematically: double-peak cases are especially brittle, recall-heavy models gain coverage by over-predicting HKLs, and access to CIF text does not close the gap in crystallographic calculation. Alongside model rankings, the benchmark identifies the conditions under which current VLMs fail on quantitative scientific figures. All data and evaluation code will be publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 26 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
  2. 2018DVQA: Understanding Data Visualizations via Question Answeringcited by 340
  3. 2019PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plotscited by 321
  4. 2017FigureQA: An Annotated Figure Dataset for Visual Reasoningcited by 319
  5. 2023MMC: Advancing Multimodal Chart Understanding with Large-scale Instruction Tuningcited by 150
  6. 2024ChartX & ChartVLM: A Versatile Benchmark and Foundation Model for Complicated Chart Reasoningcited by 128
  7. 2023ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning in Chartscited by 120
  8. 2023MatSci-NLP: Evaluating Scientific Language Models on Materials Science Language Tasks Using Text-to-Schema Modelingcited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Diagnosing and narrowing the simulation-to-real gap in powder X-ray diffraction with a wet-dry agentic loop ↗
  2. 2026XRDiff: Crystal Structure Prediction from Powder X-Ray Diffraction Data Using Diffusion Models
  3. 2026AutoXRD: Autonomous LLM Agents and Comprehensive Evaluation for Powder Diffraction Analysis
  4. 2025Rethinking Crystal Symmetry Prediction: A Decoupled Perspective
  5. 2025XDXD: End-to-end crystal structure determination with low resolution X-ray diffraction
  6. 2026uFlowCSP: Crystal Structure Prediction using Mean flow generative models
  7. 2026SCALAR: Quantifying Structural Hallucination, Consistency, and Reasoning Gaps in Materials Foundation Models
  8. 2026Let CSP Be Your ANCHOR: Adaptive Crystal Search over Frozen Structure Priors