MetaRanker: Human-in-the-loop Active Ranking for Metalens Image Quality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image quality in modern imaging systems emerges from the coupled effects of the sensor, optics, and computational reconstruction. Ultra-thin metalenses offer a path toward substantial miniaturization of optical modules, but practical designs often exhibit pronounced chromatic and field-dependent aberrations that necessitate computational reconstruction. In current metalens pipelines, reconstruction models are commonly trained and selected using distortion-based fidelity objectives, such as PSNR, yet these proxies can be weakly correlated with human preference and downstream utility, reflecting the well-known perception--distortion trade-off. We introduce MetaRanker, a human-in-the-loop active ranking framework that formalizes metalens image quality in terms of semantic interpretability, defined as the degree to which humans can reliably recognize objects and structures in the presence of optical artifacts. MetaRanker combines a probabilistic preference model with uncertainty-aware query selection, and leverages vision--language models to provide lightweight semantic priors. Importantly, these priors are used only to guide the sampling of informative comparisons; human judgments remain the primary supervision signal throughout. Across real-world and synthetic metalens datasets with distinct degradation profiles, MetaRanker produces rankings that align most closely with human assessments, while reducing the number of pairwise annotations required by approximately 80% relative to exhaustive pairwise evaluation. Finally, we show that standard image quality assessment metrics exhibit limited alignment with human interpretability in the metalens domain, positioning MetaRanker as a practical step toward perceptually grounded metalens evaluation and co-design.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
18 of 45 references.
References · 18
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
- 2017The Perception-Distortion Tradeoffcited by 587
- 2017DSLR-Quality Photos on Mobile Devices with Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 156
- 2018DeepISP: Towards Learning an End-to-End Image Processing Pipelinecited by 88
- 2022From colouring-in to pointillism: revisiting semantic segmentation supervisioncited by 22
- 2025Image Quality Assessment: From Human to Machine Preferencecited by 12
- 2024Batch Active Learning of Reward Functions from Human Preferencescited by 8
- 2025Fine-grained Image Quality Assessment for Perceptual Image Restorationcited by 8
6 more
- 2023Deep-learning-driven end-to-end metalens imagingcited by 6
- 2024Active Preference Learning for Ordering Items In- and Out-of-samplecited by 6
- 2022Decreasing Annotation Burden of Pairwise Comparisons with Human-in-the-Loop Sorting: Application in Medical Image Artifact Ratingcited by 5
- 2025EZ-Sort: Efficient Pairwise Comparison via Zero-Shot CLIP-Based Pre-Ordering and Human-in-the-Loop Sortingcited by 3
- 2024Uncertainty-driven Sampling for Efficient Pairwise Comparison Subjective Assessmentcited by 1
- 2024Aberration Correcting Vision Transformers for High-Fidelity Metalens Imagingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.