mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

IFMTBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multilingual Translation Instruction Following

arXiv 2605.28218 ↗First posted 27 May 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern translation workflows demand more than semantic equivalence. Users routinely require models to preserve JSON or HTML schemas, honor curated glossaries, disambiguate with provided context, and match prescribed registers, often several at once. Conventional metrics such as BLEU and xCOMET capture semantic fidelity but provide little signal on constraint adherence, while general instruction following benchmarks ignore the cross-lingual nature of translation. We introduce bench, a benchmark for multilingual translation instruction following covering seven languages, with 4,506 single-constraint and 2,838 multi-constraint items spanning six constraint dimensions and five compositional patterns with instructions issued in all seven languages. Constraints are split into a gating subset verified by deterministic checkers and a continuous subset scored by a rubric-based LLM judge, combined under a multiplicative rule that resists reward hacking. Evaluating 15 models reveals systematic gaps that prior protocols miss: Instruction following scales with size more sharply than translation quality, glossary and structured-format constraints dominate the difficulty gradient, and general instruction following rankings correlate only weakly with translation behavior. Our benchmark are available at https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/Hy-MT2/tree/main/IFMTBench.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

11 of 18 references.

References · 11

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  6. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  7. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
  8. 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Followingcited by 194
  9. 2024Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Followingcited by 102
  10. 2019Training Neural Machine Translation To Apply Terminology Constraintscited by 73
  11. 2026Hy-MT2: A Family of Fast, Efficient and Powerful Multilingual Translation Models in the Wildcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026IndicIFEval: A Benchmark for Verifiable Instruction-Following Evaluation in 14 Indic Languages
  2. 2023BayLing: Bridging Cross-lingual Alignment and Instruction Following through Interactive Translation for Large Language Models
  3. 2026Qwen-MT-Lumen at WMT2026: Instruction-Specialized Translation via Quality-Aware Training and On-Policy Distillation
  4. 2024Refining Translations with LLMs: A Constraint-Aware Iterative Prompting Approach
  5. 2024X-Instruction: Aligning Language Model in Low-resource Languages with Self-curated Cross-lingual Instructions
  6. 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models on Controllable Generation under Diversified Instructions
  7. 2026Recovered in Translation: Efficient Pipeline for Automated Translation of Benchmarks and Datasets
  8. 2025RECAST: Expanding the Boundaries of LLMs' Complex Instruction Following with Multi-Constraint Data