mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Recovered in Translation: Efficient Pipeline for Automated Translation of Benchmarks and Datasets

arXiv 2602.22207 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The reliability of multilingual Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation is currently compromised by the inconsistent quality of translated benchmarks. Existing resources often suffer from semantic drift and context loss, which can lead to misleading performance metrics. In this work, we present a fully automated framework designed to address these challenges by enabling scalable, high-quality translation of datasets and benchmarks. We demonstrate that adapting test-time compute scaling strategies, specifically Universal Self-Improvement (USI) and our proposed multi-round ranking method, T-RANK, allows for significantly higher quality outputs compared to traditional pipelines. Our framework ensures that benchmarks preserve their original task structure and linguistic nuances during localization. We apply this approach to translate popular benchmarks and datasets into eight Eastern and Southern European languages (Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Slovak, Romanian, Lithuanian, Estonian, Turkish, Greek). Evaluations using both reference-based metrics and LLM-as-a-judge show that our translations surpass existing resources, resulting in more accurate downstream model assessment. We release both the framework and the improved benchmarks to facilitate robust and reproducible multilingual AI development.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2026.

Builds on

15 of 19 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  4. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  6. 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 556
  7. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 260
  8. 2023Universal Self-Consistency for Large Language Model Generationcited by 198
  9. 2023Okapi: Instruction-tuned Large Language Models in Multiple Languages with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 189
  10. 2023Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 88
  11. 2025WMT24++: Expanding the Language Coverage of WMT24 to 55 Languages & Dialectscited by 79
  12. 2024TEaR: Improving LLM-based Machine Translation with Systematic Self-Refinementcited by 37
3 more
  1. 2025MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languagescited by 13
  2. 2025When Life Gives You Samples: The Benefits of Scaling up Inference Compute for Multilingual LLMscited by 9
  3. 2025Adaptive Few-shot Prompting for Machine Translation with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Bridging the Linguistic Divide: A Survey on Leveraging Large Language Models for Machine Translation
  2. 2022Bootstrapping Multilingual Semantic Parsers using Large Language Models
  3. 2025MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation
  4. 2025Estonian WinoGrande Dataset: Comparative Analysis of LLM Performance on Human and Machine Translation
  5. 2026CLaS-Bench: A Cross-Lingual Alignment and Steering Benchmark
  6. 2025Investigating Test-Time Scaling with Reranking for Machine Translation
  7. 2026Why do Large Language Models Fail in Low-resource Translation? Unraveling the Token Dynamics of Large Language Models for Machine Translation
  8. 2026Predicting Multilingual Classification and Translation Performance of LLMs with Cross-Lingual Alignment -- Is English Enough?