mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploratory Experience Shapes the Geometry of Predictive Representations

arXiv 2605.27929 ↗First posted 27 May 2026q-bio.NC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active sensing links behavior and learning through an action-perception loop: actions determine the observations used to update internal predictive models of perception, which subsequently guide the next actions. Predictive-coding frameworks provide a natural way to model this process, since internal representations are continuously updated to predict future observations. Here, we ask how exploratory and exploitative behavioral strategies shape these internal predictive representations. We build an online learning agent in a tree-like maze with a controllable parameter regulating the balance between exploratory and exploitative regimes. The agent updates a predictive-coding-based perception model from experience generated by its own behavior. The model predicts both future maze states and reward probability, allowing the agent to select actions either by expected information gain during exploration or by predicted reward during exploitation. We show that the resulting internal predictive representations depend strongly on the agent's behavioral regime. Exploratory agents develop representations that are more spatially organized and better preserve the structure of maze transitions in latent space. In contrast, exploitative agents learn less organized representations. We then train this predictive model on natural trajectories of water-deprived mice navigating the same maze and compare the resulting representations with those learned from agent trajectories. More exploratory mice show representational geometries that closely match those of exploratory agents, whereas mice with more restricted visitation patterns resemble reward-driven, exploitative agents. Together, these findings suggest that exploration enables predictive models to form generalized internal representations by organizing latent space around both spatial location and transition context in artificial agents and animals.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

5 of 33 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Reinforcement Learning through Active Inferencecited by 47
  2. 2023Multi-intention Inverse Q-learning for Interpretable Behavior Representationcited by 9
  3. 2025Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Switching Rewards and History Dependency for Characterizing Animal Behaviorscited by 6
  4. 2023Active Sensing with Predictive Coding and Uncertainty Minimizationcited by 5
  5. 2024Time Makes Space: Emergence of Place Fields in Networks Encoding Temporally Continuous Sensory Experiencescited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.