mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Maat: The Agentic Legal Research Assistant for Competition Protection

arXiv 2605.27331 ↗First posted 26 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Competition law experts conducting legal research must review extensive volumes of cases, decisions, and judicial reports to identify precedents and assess key elements in competition and merger cases. Although general research assistants such as Claude and ChatGPT and legal assistants such as SaulLM-7B and LegalGPT are increasingly used to assist legal research, they remain inadequate for competition law analysis: they lack specialized domain expertise, provide insufficient official citations, or hallucinate competition law cases. We propose Maat, a ReAct agent that orchestrates tools corresponding to different tasks of the research process. Designed iteratively with competition law experts, Maat grounds cases and findings in official sources using RAG for reliability, provides rich in-line citations, falls back to web search when database coverage is insufficient, and prompts the user for clarification when queries are ambiguous. Maat significantly outperforms all baseline assistants on case-specific tasks and performs within range of the top baseline on theoretical question tasks. The dataset used is available on GitHub.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

Builds on

10 of 37 references.

References · 10

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2024SaulLM-7B: A pioneering Large Language Model for Lawcited by 136
  3. 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domaincited by 113
  4. 2024Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challengescited by 42
  5. 2024Applicability of Large Language Models and Generative Models for Legal Case Judgement Summarizationcited by 23
  6. 2025On Verifiable Legal Reasoning: A Multi-Agent Framework with Formalized Knowledge Representationscited by 16
  7. 2025Elevating Legal LLM Responses: Harnessing Trainable Logical Structures and Semantic Knowledge with Legal Reasoningcited by 13
  8. 2025L-MARS: Legal Multi-Agent System with Agentic Search and Citation-Faithfulness Auditcited by 11
  9. 2024The Factuality of Large Language Models in the Legal Domaincited by 10
  10. 2025All for law and law for all: Adaptive RAG Pipeline for Legal Researchcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Legal Research Bench: Measuring End-to-End Reliability in Long-Horizon Legal Research Agents
  2. 2026LawCompass: Navigating from Legal QA to Multi-Agent Deep Research with Grounded Evidence
  3. 2026ASTRA - Agentic System for Ticket Resolution and Analysis
  4. 2026Schematize: An Agentic System for Generating and Refining Information-Extraction Schemas for Legal Research
  5. 2026InvestigationWorlds: An Agentic Environment for Legal Investigation
  6. 2026Benchmarking Legal RAG: The Promise and Limits of AI Statutory Surveys
  7. 2024CLERC: A Dataset for Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generation
  8. 2026L-MAD: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Structures in Legal Reasoning