mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EviACT: An Evidence-to-Action Framework for Agentic Program Repair

arXiv 2605.27238 ↗First posted 26 May 2026cs.SEcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based agents have moved automated program repair (APR) from fixed-context patch generation to interactive repository-level repair. However, existing agentic APR systems still struggle to use execution evidence to guide localization, patch generation, and validation. We propose EviACT (Evidence-to-Action), an agentic APR framework that coordinates three evidence-driven guardrails across repair stages. The retrieval scaffold grounds repair context, the compile gate filters invalid edits, and the test-driven gate checks target-test recovery before full regression. Across four benchmarks, EviACT improves resolve rate over the strongest reported comparable baselines by 1.6-6.0 percentage points and shows 70.1-88.6% lower reported per-bug API cost where baseline costs are available. Ablations and diagnostics suggest that these gains are associated with the coordinated evidence-to-action chain, making agentic APR more effective and efficient.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

Builds on

15 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Abstain and Validate: A Dual-LLM Policy for Reducing Noise in Agentic Program Repair3 Oct
  2. 2025SemAgent: A Semantics Aware Program Repair Agent19 Jun
  3. 2024MarsCode Agent: AI-native Automated Bug Fixing2 Sep
  4. 2024SpecRover: Code Intent Extraction via LLMs5 Aug
  5. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
  6. 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repair25 Mar

Other references · 9

  1. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  2. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  3. 2018SequenceR: Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for End-to-End Program Repaircited by 145
  4. 2018An Empirical Study on Learning Bug-Fixing Patches in the Wild via Neural Machine Translationcited by 108
  5. 2025SWE-Fixer: Training Open-Source LLMs for Effective and Efficient GitHub Issue Resolutioncited by 90
  6. 2024Alibaba LingmaAgent: Improving Automated Issue Resolution via Comprehensive Repository Explorationcited by 58
  7. 2025A Survey of LLM-based Automated Program Repair: Taxonomies, Design Paradigms, and Applicationscited by 25
  8. 2025Co-PatcheR: Collaborative Software Patching with Component(s)-specific Small Reasoning Modelscited by 12
  9. 2025SoK: Automated Vulnerability Repair: Methods, Tools, and Assessmentscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Multi-Perspective Agentic Program Repair via Code Property Graphs and Temporal Execution Graphs
  2. 2025Understanding Automated Program Repair Agents Through the Lens of Traceability: An Empirical Study
  3. 2026AgenticRepair: Multi-Faceted Program Context Engineering for Agentic Vulnerability Repair
  4. 2025HAFixAgent: History-Aware Program Repair Agent
  5. 2025REFINE: Enhancing Program Repair Agents through Context-Aware Patch Refinement
  6. 2026ContraFix: Skill-Enhanced Contrastive Runtime Analysis for Vulnerability Repair
  7. 2026TraceView: Interactive Visualization of Agentic Program Repair Trajectories
  8. 2026From Historical Patches to Repair Plans: Outcome-Conditioned Reasoning for Repository-Level Program Repair