SPHERE-JEPA: Spherical Prediction with Homogeneous Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A fundamental open question in self-supervised learning (SSL) is the explicit characterization of the optimal geometry of the learned representations. Recently, LeJEPA identified isotropic Gaussian embeddings as optimal for minimizing downstream prediction risk in Euclidean spaces. However, the corresponding problem for distributions supported on lower-dimensional manifolds, such as the hypersphere, remains unexplored. In this work, we demonstrate that extending this minimax analysis to smooth distributions on Riemannian manifolds fundamentally changes the optimal solution. We show that, under a worst-case formulation, both k-nearest neighbors and kernel ridge regression induce hyperspherical uniformity. More precisely, we show that uniform distributions on manifolds are optimal for k-nearest neighbors, and that the uniform distribution on the sphere is optimal for kernel ridge regression with both the exponential dot-product kernel and the linear kernel. This theoretical insight reveals a fundamental limitation of Gaussian embeddings: their non-uniform density induces anisotropic k-NN neighborhoods, severely biasing the estimator. To correct this, we introduce SPHERE-JEPA, a theoretically grounded SSL framework. We adapt LeJEPA's Cram'er-Wold projection mechanism to enforce hyperspherical uniformity rather than a Gaussian prior. Empirically, SPHERE-JEPA yields significant improvements, boosting texture retrieval mAP by over 6%, while consistently matching or outperforming LeJEPA on standard benchmarks-including a +1.8% linear probing gain on ImageNet-1K (ViT-B/14).
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.
Builds on
14 of 32 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
- 2025LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristicscited by 227
2 more
- 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 136
- 2018Spreading vectors for similarity searchcited by 114
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Expanding SPHERE-JEPA: A Family of Statistical Regularizers for the Hyperspherecited by 3
- 2026Unbiased Open World Regularization for Fair Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1
- 2026Beyond Gaussian Worlds: Latent Geometry Matters for JEPAscited by 1
- 2026Capturing Cardiac Cyclicity through Phase-Equivariant Self-Supervised Learningcited by 0
- 2026Shared Gaussianization: What Gaussian Regularizers Certify About Contrastive Learning, and What They Misscited by 0
- 2026Shared Gaussianization: What Gaussian Regularizers Certify About Contrastive Learning, and What They Miss7 Oct 2026
- 2026Beyond Gaussian Worlds: Latent Geometry Matters for JEPAs18 Sep 2026
- 2026Capturing Cardiac Cyclicity through Phase-Equivariant Self-Supervised Learning21 Aug 2026
- 2026Unbiased Open World Regularization for Fair Self-Supervised Learning24 Jul 2026
- 2026Expanding SPHERE-JEPA: A Family of Statistical Regularizers for the Hypersphere16 Jun 2026