mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Erased but Exploitable: Black-box Embedding-Aware Prompting Against Unlearned Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

arXiv 2605.26332 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning aims to remove specific concepts from pretrained text-to-image diffusion models, yet several white- and black-box attacks have been introduced to make the model generate such unlearned concepts. These attacks, nevertheless, do not assume a realistic threat model, i.e. they either assume access to the model weights, or result in gibberish adversarial prompts that could be easily detected even through naive rule-based safeguarding. We aim to address this gap in this paper. We introduce BEAP, a black-box, embedding-aware adversarial prompting attack that leverages a large language model (LLM) to iteratively generate effective adversarial prompts and exploit such hidden vulnerabilities. BEAP performs an embedding-aware search in text space, combining multiple reward signals: unlearned concept presence, text-image alignment, and image quality, to refine generated prompts. Unlike previous attack methods, BEAP keeps its prompts undetectable to safety filters while producing high-quality images. Across five unlearning methods, BEAP achieves a macro-averaged ASR of 97.8% under the held-out OpenNSFW2 evaluation, exceeding the white-box UDA baseline by 41.6 percentage points (56.2% to 97.8%). Counting unsuccessful searches at the full 100-query budget, BEAP uses 32.1 image-generation queries per evaluated prompt on average under this criterion.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 33 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

33 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 17

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SafeGen: Mitigating Sexually Explicit Content Generation in Text-to-Image Models10 Apr
  2. 2024MACE: Mass Concept Erasure in Diffusion Models10 Mar
  3. 2023One-Dimensional Adapter to Rule Them All: Concepts, Diffusion Models and Erasing Applications26 Dec
  4. 2023Receler: Reliable Concept Erasing of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Lightweight Erasers29 Nov
  5. 2023MMA-Diffusion: MultiModal Attack on Diffusion Models29 Nov
  6. 2023SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation19 Oct
  7. 2023To Generate or Not? Safety-Driven Unlearned Diffusion Models Are Still Easy To Generate Unsafe Images ... For Now18 Oct
  8. 2023Ring-A-Bell! How Reliable are Concept Removal Methods for Diffusion Models?16 Oct
  9. 2023Prompting4Debugging: Red-Teaming Text-to-Image Diffusion Models by Finding Problematic Prompts12 Sep
  10. 2023Unified Concept Editing in Diffusion Models25 Aug
  11. 2023SneakyPrompt: Jailbreaking Text-to-image Generative Models20 May
  12. 2023Forget-Me-Not: Learning to Forget in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models30 Mar
5 more
  1. 2023A Pilot Study of Query-Free Adversarial Attack against Stable Diffusion29 Mar
  2. 2023Ablating Concepts in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models23 Mar
  3. 2023Erasing Concepts from Diffusion Models13 Mar
  4. 2022Safe Latent Diffusion: Mitigating Inappropriate Degeneration in Diffusion Models9 Nov
  5. 2022Red-Teaming the Stable Diffusion Safety Filter3 Oct

Other references · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  6. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
  7. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  8. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
  9. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 465
  10. 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearningcited by 312
  11. 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 203
  12. 2024ReNO: Enhancing One-step Text-to-Image Models through Reward-based Noise Optimizationcited by 119
4 more
  1. 2024ShieldLM: Empowering LLMs as Aligned, Customizable and Explainable Safety Detectorscited by 51
  2. 2024Perception-guided Jailbreak against Text-to-Image Modelscited by 40
  3. 2023Mitigating Inappropriateness in Image Generation: Can there be Value in Reflecting the World's Ugliness?cited by 16
  4. 2025Evaluating the Evaluators: Metrics for Compositional Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Defensive Unlearning with Adversarial Training for Robust Concept Erasure in Diffusion Models
  2. 2025Rethinking the Vulnerability of Concept Erasure and a New Method
  3. 2025PROMPTMINER: Black-Box Prompt Stealing against Text-to-Image Generative Models via Reinforcement Learning and Fuzz Optimization
  4. 2025Prompt-Based Safety Guidance Is Ineffective for Unlearned Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  5. 2024AdvAnchor: Enhancing Diffusion Model Unlearning with Adversarial Anchors
  6. 2025PromptFlare: Prompt-Generalized Defense via Cross-Attention Decoy in Diffusion-Based Inpainting
  7. 2025PLA: Prompt Learning Attack against Text-to-Image Generative Models
  8. 2026DiSCO: Defending text-to-image generation through distribution-guided contrastive prompt optimization