Anticipate and Learn: Unleashing Idle-Time Compute in Proactive Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While AI agents demonstrate remarkable capabilities in reasoning and tool use, they remain fundamentally reactive: they compute responses only after explicit user prompts. This paradigm ignores a critical opportunity: the idle time between interactions is largely wasted, leaving agents unable to prepare for future user needs. To bridge this gap, we introduce ProAct, a proactive agent architecture that leverages idle-time compute to anticipate and fulfill likely upcoming user needs. By analyzing evolving dialogue history together with persistent memory, ProAct predicts upcoming needs and iteratively acquires information, allowing the agent to resolve knowledge gaps and prepare evidence before the user initiates a query. To rigorously evaluate proactive capabilities, we also introduce ProActEval, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 200 scenarios across 40 domains, featuring predictable need chains and diverse user cognitive profiles. Empirical results demonstrate significant advantages over reactive baselines. ProAct accelerates task completion by reducing required turns by 14.8%, decreases user effort by 11.7%, and cuts hallucination rates by 28.1% on ProActEval. Furthermore, MemBench evaluations confirm that ProAct achieves state-of-the-art reflective accuracy, underscoring its sustained and robust performance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
18 of 30 references.
References · 18
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 707
- 2023MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memorycited by 556
- 2024ToolACE: Winning the Points of LLM Function Callingcited by 216
- 2023SCM: Enhancing Large Language Model with Self-Controlled Memory Frameworkcited by 98
- 2024Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistancecited by 87
- 2025MemBench: Towards More Comprehensive Evaluation on the Memory of LLM-based Agentscited by 84
- 2023A Survey on Proactive Dialogue Systems: Problems, Methods, and Prospectscited by 66
6 more
- 2025General Agentic Memory Via Deep Researchcited by 47
- 2025Sleep-time Compute: Beyond Inference Scaling at Test-timecited by 43
- 2024MemSim: A Bayesian Simulator for Evaluating Memory of LLM-based Personal Assistantscited by 24
- 2024MetaReflection: Learning Instructions for Language Agents using Past Reflectionscited by 19
- 2026Lightweight LLM Agent Memory with Small Language Modelscited by 13
- 2026ProactiveBench: Benchmarking Proactiveness in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Studying Without a Syllabus: Task-Agnostic Environment Preprocessingcited by 0
- 2026How Strongly Should Task State Influence an LLM Agent?cited by 0
- 2026Foundations of Proactive Agents: Principles, Technical Layers, and Proactivity-Gymcited by 0
- 2026Who Is Your Agent Serving? Provider-Side Indirect Prompt Injection in Proactive Agentscited by 0
- 2026Who Is Your Agent Serving? Provider-Side Indirect Prompt Injection in Proactive Agents4 Oct 2026
- 2026Foundations of Proactive Agents: Principles, Technical Layers, and Proactivity-Gym29 Sep 2026
- 2026How Strongly Should Task State Influence an LLM Agent?22 Sep 2026
- 2026Studying Without a Syllabus: Task-Agnostic Environment Preprocessing9 Sep 2026