mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

QUIET: A Multi-Blank Cascaded Story Cloze Benchmark for LLM Creative Generation Capability

arXiv 2605.25955 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) face a dual challenge in creative capability evaluation: existing benchmarks (e.g., Story Cloze Test, HellaSwag) measure models' discriminative ability over narrative continuation using multiple-choice recognition paradigms, rather than directly measuring creative generation capability; rubric-based scoring and LLM-as-Judge methods rely on subjective dimension assessment or natural language model outputs, and cannot provide objective, automated scoring mechanisms. This paper proposes QUIET (Quality Understanding via Interlocked Evaluation Testing), a diagnostic benchmark for LLM creative capability based on multi-blank cascaded story cloze. QUIET sets N blanks (10-20) in a story with complete structure, with each blank accompanied by an explicit content constraint, and cascade dependency relationships between blanks -- the content filled into earlier blanks constrains the feasible solution space for later blanks. The evaluated model (or human participants) fills all blanks in open-ended generation mode; the results are scored by an information-theoretic automated scoring protocol without human grading. The scoring protocol directly operationalizes the "calibrated surprise" theoretical framework (Zou & Xu, 2026a). For each blank k, a composite score is computed: score = satisfy * (1 + lambda * surprise), where lambda = 1.0. Here, "satisfy" measures how well the blank filling satisfies the content constraint (objective logical reasoning judgment, not subjective aesthetic scoring), and "surprise" measures the degree of surprise given that the constraint is satisfied. Creative answers that do not satisfy the constraint score zero; answers that satisfy the constraint but are mediocre score low; answers that satisfy the constraint and are surprising score high.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 4 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

0 of 4 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LitBench: A Benchmark and Dataset for Reliable Evaluation of Creative Writing
  2. 2025Style over Story: Measuring LLM Narrative Preferences via Structured Selection
  3. 2025CreativityPrism: A Cross-Domain Evaluation Framework for Large Language Model Creativity
  4. 2026CreativeInstruct: Scalably Teaching LLMs to Balance Quality, Creativity, and Diversity
  5. 2024Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives?
  6. 2025Creative Preference Optimization
  7. 2025A Causality-aware Paradigm for Evaluating Creativity of Multimodal Large Language Models
  8. 2026When Reasoning Supervision Hurts: TTCW-Based Long-Form Literary Review Generation