mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Certified Robustness from Approximate Gaussian Mixture Structures in Pretrained Latent Spaces

arXiv 2605.25352 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, raising important concerns for safety-critical deployment. Empirical defenses can achieve strong robustness in practice, but lack formal guarantees, motivating the need for certifiably robust classifiers. While certified methods provide formal guarantees, they often yield overly conservative bounds due to their inability to exploit structure in complex data distributions. In this work, we propose a framework for designing certifiably robust classifiers that leverages latent structure in data representations. We first analyze the Gaussian mixture setting, deriving necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of robust classifiers and constructing a classifier with a closed-form robustness certificate and generalization guarantees. Our main contribution is to show that exact structure is not required: we prove that if a pretrained encoder maps inputs to a latent distribution that is varepsilon-close (in KL divergence) to a Gaussian mixture, then certified accuracy degrades gracefully, with an explicit bound relating robustness under the true and approximate distributions. This result enables the direct use of pretrained models without requiring exact distributional assumptions. Empirically, our method achieves state-of-the-art or competitive certified accuracy on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, while maintaining strong clean performance and low computational overhead. Overall, our work establishes approximate latent structure as a practical and principled route to certifiable robustness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 26 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  4. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  5. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  6. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  7. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  8. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
  9. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  10. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
  11. 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 181
  12. 2024Robust CLIP: Unsupervised Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Vision Embeddings for Robust Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 119
6 more
  1. 2018Are adversarial examples inevitable?cited by 113
  2. 2021Boosting Randomized Smoothing with Variance Reduced Classifierscited by 47
  3. 2019Adversarial Risk via Optimal Transport and Optimal Couplingscited by 36
  4. 2023Image Clustering via the Principle of Rate Reduction in the Age of Pretrained Modelscited by 22
  5. 2023Adversarial Examples Might be Avoidable: The Role of Data Concentration in Adversarial Robustnesscited by 11
  6. 2024Certified Robustness against Sparse Adversarial Perturbations via Data Localizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.