mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Performance Comparison of Classical and Neural Sampling Algorithms for Robotic Navigation

arXiv 2605.25010 ↗First posted 24 May 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into sampling-based motion planning provides new possibilities for improving autonomous navigation efficiency. In this paper, three algorithms, namely RRT*, Neural RRT*, and Neural Informed RRT*, are implemented and evaluated on environments containing convex and concave obstacles with different obstacle densities. The obtained results indicate that neural-guided planners improve path quality, producing up to 14% shorter paths and 55--75% smoother trajectories compared with the conventional RRT* algorithm. Among the evaluated methods, Neural Informed RRT* achieves the best overall performance in terms of path length and trajectory smoothness. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of AI-guided sampling strategies for improving reliability and trajectory efficiency in robotic and UAV navigation, despite a slight increase in computation time. Overall, the study highlights the growing importance of artificial intelligence in real-time robotic path planning applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2026.

Builds on

4 of 11 references.

References · 4

  1. 2018Motion Planning Networkscited by 78
  2. 2014Informed RRT*: Optimal Sampling-based Path Planning Focused via Direct Sampling of an Admissible Ellipsoidal Heuristiccited by 50
  3. 2018Robot Motion Planning in Learned Latent Spacescited by 40
  4. 2023Neural Informed RRT*: Learning-based Path Planning with Point Cloud State Representations under Admissible Ellipsoidal Constraintscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.