mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Translators as Invisible Teachers of AI: Copyright, Translation Memory, and the Political Economy of Linguistic Data

arXiv 2605.24842 ↗First posted 24 May 2026cs.CL cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper examines how the labour of translators has been transformed into foundational data capital for the age of artificial intelligence (AI). Translation memories (TM) and parallel corpora preserve a one-to-one correspondence between source and target text and therefore constitute extraordinarily valuable supervised training data for machine translation. The development of statistical machine translation (SMT), neural machine translation (NMT), the Transformer architecture, and multilingual large language models (LLMs) cannot be disentangled from the accumulation of such translation data. And yet, translators' renditions have been bought as deliverables under contract, segmented as technical objects, and processed as "information analysis" data under copyright law -- losing their moral, creative, and economic attribution to the translators who produced them. The paper develops two concepts to capture this process. The first is appropriation without consumption: a mode of use in which works are not read, viewed, or listened to, but only mined for statistical features -- a use that is legitimated under Article 30-4 of the Japanese Copyright Act. The second is the invisible teacherisation of translators: the process by which translators, through the construction of translation memories, post-editing, and quality assessment, have functioned as teachers of AI without recognition as such. Drawing on the data supply chain that runs from translators through language service providers (LSPs) and platforms to model developers, on a comparative reading of Japanese, European, and United States legal frameworks, on the distinction between open and proprietary AI models, and on the premium status that human-generated data has acquired in the era of model collapse, the paper asks what translators are actually afraid of, and points toward concrete directions for redistributive design.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2026.

Builds on

3 of 15 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  3. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation
  2. 2025AI agents may be worth the hype but not the resources (yet): An initial exploration of machine translation quality and costs in three language pairs in the legal and news domains
  3. 2024Release of Pre-Trained Models for the Japanese Language
  4. 2024Multi-perspective Alignment for Increasing Naturalness in Neural Machine Translation
  5. 2024From LLM to NMT: Advancing Low-Resource Machine Translation with Claude
  6. 2026Extracting books from production language models
  7. 2021Selective Knowledge Distillation for Neural Machine Translation
  8. 2024The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models