Ellipsoid Control: A White-list Jailbreak Defense via Benign Latent Modeling
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
Representation engineering (RepE) defenses have shown strong robustness against jailbreak attacks on large language models (LLMs). However, these methods fundamentally rely on black-list supervision: they learn jailbreak-to-refusal activation transformations from harmful or jailbreak data that are inherently incomplete and continuously evolving. Hence, the performance of RepE-based defenses becomes tightly coupled to the quality and coverage of collected harmful samples, leaving models vulnerable to unseen attacks. This reliance also obscures the distinction between defenses that fit known harmful distributions and defenses that protect a benign latent region without estimating the harmful distribution. We adopt the opposite, the white-list perspective, by leveraging the accessibility and abundance of benign data. The goal is to elicit refusal on arbitrary inputs while ensuring that harmless inputs are not falsely rejected. This shifts the core research question to: How can we design a robust benign-latent preservation mechanism such that the benign latent distribution remains intact while refusal is elicited? To answer this, we propose Ellipsoid Control, a test-time defense. It performs projected gradient descent that can elicit refusal on arbitrary inputs, aiming to improve defense effectiveness. At the same time, an anisotropic benign-geometry ellipsoid is fitted from abundant benign data to constrain the update to minimize distortion of the benign latent geometry. This tight constraint helps preserve model utility. Across multiple LLMs, jailbreak attacks, benign tasks, and safety-boundary evaluations, Ellipsoid Control consistently enhances safety while better preserving utility, demonstrating the effectiveness of the white-list approach for jailbreak defense
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 32 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2026.
Builds on
32 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 15
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Jailbreak Antidote: Runtime Safety-Utility Balance via Sparse Representation Adjustment in Large Language Models3 Oct
- 2024HSF: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks with Hidden State Filtering31 Aug
- 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMs22 Jul
- 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey5 Jul
- 2024Gradient Cuff: Detecting Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models by Exploring Refusal Loss Landscapes1 Mar
- 2024Defending Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks via Semantic Smoothing25 Feb
- 2024GradSafe: Detecting Jailbreak Prompts for LLMs via Safety-Critical Gradient Analysis21 Feb
- 2024Soft Prompt Threats: Attacking Safety Alignment and Unlearning in Open-Source LLMs through the Embedding Space14 Feb
- 2024Intention Analysis Makes LLMs A Good Jailbreak Defender12 Jan
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
- 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks5 Oct
- 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
3 more
Other references · 17
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
- 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 651
5 more
- 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 322
- 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 244
- 2024Programming Refusal with Conditional Activation Steeringcited by 206
- 2025AlphaSteer: Learning Refusal Steering with Principled Null-Space Constraintcited by 49
- 2025HiddenDetect: Detecting Jailbreak Attacks against Large Vision-Language Models via Monitoring Hidden Statescited by 33
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025How Jailbreak Defenses Work and Ensemble? A Mechanistic Investigation
- 2025Latent Fusion Jailbreak: Blending Harmful and Harmless Representations to Elicit Unsafe LLM Outputs
- 2026Causal Front-Door Adjustment for Robust Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs
- 2025Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Exploits with Responsible AI Considerations
- 2024Jailbreak Defense in a Narrow Domain: Limitations of Existing Methods and a New Transcript-Classifier Approach
- 2026TRYLOCK: Defense-in-Depth Against LLM Jailbreaks via Layered Preference and Representation Engineering
- 2025SafeInt: Shielding Large Language Models from Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Representation Intervention
- 2026Revisiting JBShield: Breaking and Rebuilding Representation-Level Jailbreak Defenses