mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Debiased Negative Mining Improves Out-of-distribution Detection with Pre-trained Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2605.23797 ↗First posted 22 May 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Aiming at identifying unexpected inputs from unknown classes, out-of-distribution (OOD) detection has emerged as a pivotal approach to enhancing the reliability of machine learning models. This paper focuses on the burgeoning paradigm of post-hoc OOD detection with pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs), where a popular pipeline is to detect OOD inputs by examining their affinities between ID labels and negative labels, i.e., those semantically different from ID labels. Due to the unavailability of target OOD labels, existing works predominantly rely on heuristic rules to mine negative labels from unlabeled wild corpus data. Despite the empirical success, we argue that the power of VLM-based OOD detection has yet to be fully unleashed since the notorious false negative problem is far from addressed in the literature. With this motivation, we are interested in addressing the challenge of mining true negative labels for OOD scoring. To this end, we develop a theoretical framework for correcting the sampling bias of negatives labels by indirectly approximating the distribution of negative labels. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that the debiased negative mining can be naturally converted into Monte-Carlo sampling based on ID labels and the unlabeled wild corpus data. Extensive experiments empirically manifest that our method establishes a new state-of-the-art in a variety of OOD detection setups. Code is publicly available at hrefhttps://github.com/60pen9/Debiased-Negative-Mining-Improves-OOD-Detection-with-Pre-trained-VLMstextcolorredhere.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 41 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.

Builds on

41 of 76 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024AdaNeg: Adaptive Negative Proxy Guided OOD Detection with Vision-Language Models26 Oct
  2. 2024Conjugated Semantic Pool Improves OOD Detection with Pre-trained Vision-Language Models11 Oct
  3. 2024LAPT: Label-driven Automated Prompt Tuning for OOD Detection with Vision-Language Models12 Jul
  4. 2024Negative Label Guided OOD Detection with Pretrained Vision-Language Models29 Mar

Other references · 37

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  3. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  4. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  5. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  6. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  7. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  8. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  9. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  10. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  11. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  12. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
25 more
  1. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
  2. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  3. 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
  4. 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
  5. 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
  6. 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 338
  7. 2022VOS: Learning What You Don't Know by Virtual Outlier Synthesiscited by 300
  8. 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 227
  9. 2022Delving into Out-of-Distribution Detection with Vision-Language Representationscited by 215
  10. 2018Reducing Network Agnostophobiacited by 165
  11. 2021Zero-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection Based on the Pre-trained Model CLIPcited by 151
  12. 2023CLIPN for Zero-Shot OOD Detection: Teaching CLIP to Say Nocited by 130
  13. 2023Non-Parametric Outlier Synthesiscited by 129
  14. 2022Is Out-of-Distribution Detection Learnable?cited by 109
  15. 2023LoCoOp: Few-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection via Prompt Learningcited by 107
  16. 2019Reverse KL-Divergence Training of Prior Networks: Improved Uncertainty and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 104
  17. 2021Can multi-label classification networks know what they don't know?cited by 100
  18. 2022Training OOD Detectors in their Natural Habitatscited by 86
  19. 2021Provable Guarantees for Understanding Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 78
  20. 2021Learning Representation for Clustering via Prototype Scattering and Positive Samplingcited by 58
  21. 2024Learning Transferable Negative Prompts for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 43
  22. 2023Understanding Transferable Representation Learning and Zero-shot Transfer in CLIPcited by 26
  23. 2024ConjNorm: Tractable Density Estimation for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 22
  24. 2022Out of Distribution Data Detection Using Dropout Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 15
  25. 2025On the Provable Importance of Gradients for Language-Assisted Image Clusteringcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Out-of-Distribution Detection with Positive and Negative Prompt Supervision Using Large Language Models
  2. 2025Harnessing Large Language and Vision-Language Models for Robust Out-of-Distribution Detection
  3. 2026Activation Matters: Test-time Activated Negative Labels for OOD Detection with Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025SimLabel: Consistency-Guided OOD Detection with Pretrained Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026NegAS: Negative Label Guided Attention and Scoring for Out-of-Distribution Object Detection with Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection and Beyond in Vision Language Model Era: A Survey
  7. 2025ANTS: Adaptive Negative Textual Space Shaping for OOD Detection via Test-Time MLLM Understanding and Reasoning
  8. 2024CMOOD: Concept-based Multi-label OOD Detection