Unextractable Protocol Models: Collaborative Training and Inference without Weight Materialization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a decentralized setup in which the participants collaboratively train and serve a large neural network, and where each participant only processes a subset of the model. In this setup, we explore the possibility of unmaterializable weights, where a full weight set is never available to any one participant. We introduce Unextractable Protocol Models (UPMs): a training and inference framework that leverages the sharded model setup to ensure model shards (i.e., subsets) held by participants are incompatible at different time steps. UPMs periodically inject time-varying, random, invertible transforms at participant boundaries; preserving the overall network function yet rendering cross-time assemblies incoherent. On Qwen-2.5-0.5B and Llama-3.2-1B, 10,000 transforms leave FP32 perplexity unchanged (DeltaPPL < 0.01; Jensen-Shannon drift < 4 × 10-5), and we show how to control growth for lower precision datatypes. Applying a transform every 30s adds 3% latency, 0.1% bandwidth, and 10% GPU-memory overhead at inference, while training overhead falls to 1.6% time and < 1% memory. We consider several attacks, showing that the requirements of direct attacks are impractical and easy to defend against, and that gradient-based fine-tuning of stitched partitions consumes ≥ 60% of the tokens required to train from scratch. By enabling models to be collaboratively trained yet not extracted, UPMs make it practical to embed programmatic incentive mechanisms in community-driven decentralized training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.
Builds on
39 of 68 references.
References · 39
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,868
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
- 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 567
27 more
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 502
- 2019A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protectioncited by 374
- 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 368
- 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 367
- 2019PowerSGD: Practical Low-Rank Gradient Compression for Distributed Optimizationcited by 238
- 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 184
- 2018Training behavior of deep neural network in frequency domaincited by 174
- 2017Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 159
- 2024Stealing Part of a Production Language Modelcited by 159
- 2019Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIscited by 139
- 2018PipeDream: Fast and Efficient Pipeline Parallel DNN Trainingcited by 117
- 2022Decentralized Training of Foundation Models in Heterogeneous Environmentscited by 87
- 2022Petals: Collaborative Inference and Fine-tuning of Large Modelscited by 87
- 2024TorchTitan: One-stop PyTorch native solution for production ready LLM pre-trainingcited by 85
- 2023When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motivations, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 84
- 2020Imitation Attacks and Defenses for Black-box Machine Translation Systemscited by 81
- 2020The De-democratization of AI: Deep Learning and the Compute Divide in Artificial Intelligence Researchcited by 67
- 2023SWARM Parallelism: Training Large Models Can Be Surprisingly Communication-Efficientcited by 59
- 2021Distributed Deep Learning in Open Collaborationscited by 58
- 2023Federated Foundation Models: Privacy-Preserving and Collaborative Learning for Large Modelscited by 50
- 2019Incentive Design for Efficient Federated Learning in Mobile Networks: A Contract Theory Approachcited by 45
- 2020Towards Crowdsourced Training of Large Neural Networks using Decentralized Mixture-of-Expertscited by 43
- 2021Moshpit SGD: Communication-Efficient Decentralized Training on Heterogeneous Unreliable Devicescited by 36
- 2016Gossip training for deep learningcited by 35
- 2020Communication-Efficient Decentralized Learning with Sparsification and Adaptive Peer Selectioncited by 20
- 2025Subspace Networks: Scaling Decentralized Training with Communication-Efficient Model Parallelismcited by 12
- 2025Nesterov Method for Asynchronous Pipeline Parallel Optimizationcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.