mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evolutionary Multi-Task Optimization for LLM-Guided Program Discovery

arXiv 2605.22613 ↗First posted 21 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent LLM-guided evolutionary search methods have shown that iterative program mutation can discover strong algorithms, but they typically optimize each task independently, even when related tasks share reusable structure. We introduce Evolutionary Multi-Task Optimization (EMO) for LLM-guided program discovery, and propose EMO-STA (Shared-Then-Adapt), a two-stage framework that first evolves a shared archive of executable programs across a task family and then adapts selected shared candidates to each target task. Within EMO-STA, we explore multiple adaptation strategies, including warm-starting from the shared archive, adapting the best average shared program, and adapting the shared program that performs best on each target task. Across eight task families spanning continuous optimization, geometric construction, modeling, and algorithmic optimization, EMO-STA improves over matched-compute single-task evolution in most settings, with STA Best-Local providing the strongest in-distribution adaptation and STA Best-Shared yielding robust transfer to unseen tasks. Compute-allocation experiments show that allocating a substantial fraction of the family-level budget to shared evolution is consistently beneficial, with roughly balanced shared and adaptation budgets often being optimal. Beyond compute efficiency, we show that shared evolution can mitigate overfitting in low-evidence settings (e.g. few training data), including ARC tasks and time-series feature engineering, by favoring programs that generalize across all tasks rather than exploiting task-specific brittle artifacts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.

Builds on

20 of 44 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  2. 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
  3. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  4. 2024GIFT-Eval: A Benchmark For General Time Series Forecasting Model Evaluationcited by 188
  5. 2024The Surprising Effectiveness of Test-Time Training for Few-Shot Learningcited by 88
  6. 2023LLMs and the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus: Successes, Failures, and the Importance of Object-based Representationscited by 81
  7. 2013A Literature Survey of Benchmark Functions For Global Optimization Problemscited by 75
  8. 2024Beyond Model Adaptation at Test Time: A Surveycited by 55
  9. 2025Test-Time Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 46
  10. 2026AdaEvolve: Adaptive LLM Driven Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 46
  11. 2026DeltaEvolve: Accelerating Scientific Discovery through Momentum-Driven Evolutioncited by 23
  12. 2016Warm Starting Bayesian Optimizationcited by 21
8 more
  1. 2020Warm Starting CMA-ES for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 18
  2. 2025PEFT A2Z: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Survey for Large Language and Vision Modelscited by 16
  3. 2025Test-Time Training Provably Improves Transformers as In-context Learnerscited by 15
  4. 2025Can Language Models Discover Scaling Laws?cited by 12
  5. 2024Identifying Task Groupings for Multi-Task Learning Using Pointwise V-Usable Informationcited by 4
  6. 2017Multitask Evolution with Cartesian Genetic Programmingcited by 2
  7. 2025NAACL2025 Tutorial: Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 2
  8. 2014Seeding the Initial Population of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computational Studycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.