Format-Constraint Coupling in Knowledge Graph Construction from Statistical Tables
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An extraction schema should not reduce knowledge graph fidelity. On statistical CSV, however, it can. We study country-by-year time-series matrices, a common layout on open-data portals. In this setting, serialization format and schema constraints interact super-additively. Their joint effect exceeds the sum of independent effects by up to +1.180 (2x2 factorial, 6 datasets). Bootstrap 95% CIs are strictly positive on 4/6 datasets, with strongest evidence on wide Type-II matrices. More critically, a schema applied to a mismatched format can trigger catastrophic mismatch. Fact coverage falls below the unconstrained baseline on 4/6 datasets through entity inflation or extraction refusal. We call this observed pattern format-constraint coupling. Probing and token ablation support a surface-form anchoring explanation centred on column-name references. Controlled variants across format-schema pairings, GraphRAG hosts, and LLM families show the same direction within the measured scope; one LLM family shows only partial activation. The observation also has a diagnostic consequence. Three standard retrieval modes largely mask construction quality (delta <= 1pp), whereas direct graph access exposes gaps up to +47.6pp (p < 0.0001). To support fidelity-aware evaluation, we release CSVFidelity-Bench. It contains 15 datasets, 11 Type-II matrices, 4 Type-III tables, and 1,892 Gold Standard facts across 6 domains.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.
Builds on
22 of 40 references.
References · 22
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,141
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 832
- 2023Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmapcited by 668
- 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
- 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 398
- 2023Larger language models do in-context learning differentlycited by 394
- 2023StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Datacited by 343
- 2024Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Surveycited by 324
10 more
- 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 235
- 2024Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table Understandingcited by 188
- 2023TableLlama: Towards Open Large Generalist Models for Tablescited by 137
- 2023GoLLIE: Annotation Guidelines improve Zero-Shot Information-Extractioncited by 119
- 2019Sherlock: A Deep Learning Approach to Semantic Data Type Detectioncited by 74
- 2024TableGPT2: A Large Multimodal Model with Tabular Data Integrationcited by 72
- 2024TableRAG: Million-Token Table Understanding with Language Modelscited by 41
- 2025AutoSchemaKG: Autonomous Knowledge Graph Construction through Dynamic Schema Induction from Web-Scale Corporacited by 23
- 2025RAG-Anything: All-in-One RAG Frameworkcited by 20
- 2025RAG over Tables: Hierarchical Memory Index, Multi-Stage Retrieval, and Benchmarkingcited by 18
Built on by
Not cited yet.