mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

TO-Agents: A Multi-Agent AI Framework for Subjective Preference-Guided Topology Optimization

arXiv 2605.21622 ↗First posted 20 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Topology optimization can generate efficient structures, but designers often must manually translate qualitative intent, such as desired visual style, product experience, or manufacturability into solver settings that are not directly tied to those preferences. We present TO-Agents, a multi-agent AI framework that connects natural-language design intent with iterative topology optimization. The framework converts a human-provided problem description into validated solver inputs, runs a topology optimization solver, renders the resulting 3D topology, and uses multiview vision-language reasoning with an independent judge agent to critique each result and revise solver parameters. We evaluate the framework on two long-horizon design tasks: a cantilever beam benchmark and a phone-stand product design. In both tasks, the designer specifies an aesthetic preference for hierarchically branched structures inspired by natural tree morphologies, and the system performs four revision cycles across ten independent replicates. TO-Agents produces at least one preference-aligned design in 60% of trials for each case study, corresponding to up to 6 × more successful trials than an ablated pipeline without visual or historical feedback. Judge scores and human evaluations show that the pipeline can identify effective parameter levers, recover from poor revisions, and expand design exploration. A manufacturing agent further post-processes top-ranked designs for additive manufacturing, enabling end-to-end intent-to-prototype design. We also identify failure modes, including overshooting, selective memory, misplaced tools, and incorrect parameter reasoning. These results suggest that agentic topology optimization can shift designers from low-level parameter tuning toward higher-level specification of form and function, while highlighting safeguards needed for reliable autonomous engineering design.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.

Builds on

7 of 41 references.

References · 7

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,492
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,831
  3. 2024Hypothesis Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 69
  4. 2025AI Agents in Engineering Design: A Multi-Agent Framework for Aesthetic and Aerodynamic Car Designcited by 21
  5. 2025BlendedNet: A Blended Wing Body Aircraft Dataset and Surrogate Model for Aerodynamic Predictionscited by 16
  6. 2025Agentic Large Language Models for Conceptual Systems Engineering and Designcited by 7
  7. 2026Higher-Order Knowledge Representations for Agentic Scientific Reasoningcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agentic Designer: Progressive Multi-Agent Collaboration for Structure-Aware Interior Layout Generation
  2. 2026Self-Refining Topology Optimization via an LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework
  3. 2025A Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization (MDO) Agent Driven by Large Language Models
  4. 2026BrickBench: Evaluating Agentic Brick Design
  5. 2026Intelligent Co-Design: An Interactive LLM Framework for Interior Spatial Design via Multi-Modal Agents
  6. 2025Co-Layout: LLM-driven Co-optimization for Interior Layout
  7. 2026LMBuild: Evaluating LLM Agents for Generating Buildable and Functional Structures
  8. 2026COSMO-Agent: Tool-Augmented Agent for Closed-loop Optimization,Simulation,and Modeling Orchestration